From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS54825 147.75.192.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org [147.75.199.223]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DCBF1F44D for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 835551C21CDA for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:18:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0FE79B9D; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cloud.peff.net (cloud.peff.net [104.130.231.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 020B679B84 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=104.130.231.41 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710235042; cv=none; b=rOSbRbBFcEGKSOb1Arpd+r9KcfB4BoQUnssVFPn+h1Ios1v+50lDxs+NHq5fbPKfVJl+h1HI3rcGHFDkk8HIkHNFBdN0FmkUVVZYPgCz/bqZ1wdjgGpDYaxcH+1Ru2E02UZtacYPYBZ7LVz1baK7CIOuX8ZfsIrERgxvnhXztXo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710235042; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5dvQ8FE98wHs8EPZ9vnT6GWkPYY46GLGx+3nN3Y5H+8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bPvnnZoRSLpcezRTaTjXB/BNT8J5MUsjIcCSJ69dGBJtdRMzIVY+Ex5gTepae+JbRriGGcFhLO+1oJaAW6+mzhHVKLgiNTdJsXETIieac+htaqt26m40U3WQOb2fQ1R15cz6fwFxnVoljtTd5AEiKvMxkIhOnz49NnKYz/jlJe8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=peff.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=peff.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=104.130.231.41 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=peff.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=peff.net Received: (qmail 17497 invoked by uid 109); 12 Mar 2024 09:17:20 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:17:20 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 28025 invoked by uid 111); 12 Mar 2024 09:17:24 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 05:17:24 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 05:17:19 -0400 From: Jeff King To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Junio C Hamano , Dragan Simic , Kristoffer Haugsbakk , Manlio Perillo , =?utf-8?B?UmVuw6k=?= Scharfe , Phillip Wood Subject: [PATCH v2 04/16] commit: refactor base-case of adjust_comment_line_char() Message-ID: <20240312091719.GD95609@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20240312091013.GA95442@coredump.intra.peff.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240312091013.GA95442@coredump.intra.peff.net> When core.commentChar is set to "auto", we check a set of candidate characters against the proposed buffer to see which if any can be used without ambiguity. But before we do that, we optimize for the common case that the default "#" is fine by just seeing if it is present in the buffer at all. The way we do this is a bit subtle, though: we assign the candidate character to comment_line_char preemptively, then check if it works, and return if it does. The subtle part is that sometimes setting comment_line_char is important (after we return, the important outcome is the fact that we have set the variable) and sometimes it is useless (if our optimization fails, we go on to do the more careful checks and eventually assign something else instead). To make it more clear what is happening (and to make further refactoring of comment_line_char easier), let's check our candidate character directly, and then assign as part of returning if it worked out. Signed-off-by: Jeff King --- builtin/commit.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/builtin/commit.c b/builtin/commit.c index a91197245f..b2d05c0cc9 100644 --- a/builtin/commit.c +++ b/builtin/commit.c @@ -685,9 +685,10 @@ static void adjust_comment_line_char(const struct strbuf *sb) char *candidate; const char *p; - comment_line_char = candidates[0]; - if (!memchr(sb->buf, comment_line_char, sb->len)) + if (!memchr(sb->buf, candidates[0], sb->len)) { + comment_line_char = candidates[0]; return; + } p = sb->buf; candidate = strchr(candidates, *p); -- 2.44.0.481.gf1a6d20963