[PATCH v4 3/3] apply: code simplification

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Rewrite a bit hard-to-read ternary ?: expression into a cascade of
if/else.

Given that read-cache.c:add_index_entry() makes sure that the
.ce_mode member is filled with a reasonable value before placing a
cache entry in the index, if we see (ce_mode == 0), there is
something seriously wrong going on.  Catch such a bug and abort,
instead of silently ignoring such an entry and silently skipping
the check.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
 apply.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/apply.c b/apply.c
index 6b1adccb2f..493a263a48 100644
--- a/apply.c
+++ b/apply.c
@@ -3780,11 +3780,15 @@ static int check_preimage(struct apply_state *state,
 	}
 
 	if (!state->cached && !previous) {
-		if (!trust_executable_bit)
-			st_mode = (*ce && (*ce)->ce_mode)
-				? (*ce)->ce_mode : patch->old_mode;
-		else
+		if (*ce && !(*ce)->ce_mode)
+			BUG("ce_mode == 0 for path '%s'", old_name);
+
+		if (trust_executable_bit)
 			st_mode = ce_mode_from_stat(*ce, st->st_mode);
+		else if (*ce)
+			st_mode = (*ce)->ce_mode;
+		else
+			st_mode = patch->old_mode;
 	}
 
 	if (patch->is_new < 0)
-- 
2.43.0-174-g055bb6e996