git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com>
To: gitster@pobox.com
Cc: --cc=avarab@gmail.com, dyroneteng@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org,
	me@ttaylorr.com, tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com,
	felipe.contreras@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] push: introduce '--heads' option
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2023 09:09:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230430010948.4396-1-tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq7ctvetbo.fsf@gitster.g>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

>Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ZheNing Hu mentioned me that could use "OPT_ALIAS" instead, it seems
>> like could be better than OPT_BIT in this scenario. If so, are problems
>> that may arise from interactions shielded? If not, I'm willing to add
>> extra test about it (some relevant advice if possible).
>
>The intent of ALIAS is to just add an extra option visible at the UI
>level that behaves exactly the same as the other one at the code
>level, so the codepath that is prepared to deal with one can handle
>the other one without any extra effort.  In fact, after the option
>parsing is finished, the rest of the code should not even be able to
>tell which one, the original or the alias, was used on the command
>line.
>
>And in this case, you'd want a new "push all branches" option that
>behaves exactly like existing "--all", and possibly you may over
>time want to deprecate the latter.  All the code to ensure how
>"--all" should interact with other options should be working fine
>(or if there is a bug, that needs to be corrected whether we would
>add this alias or not).

Make sense.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-30  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-05 13:35 [RFC PATCH 0/1] push: introduce '--heads' option Teng Long
2022-12-05 13:35 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Teng Long
2022-12-05 14:23   ` ZheNing Hu
2022-12-06 12:18     ` Teng Long
2023-04-28 12:21   ` Felipe Contreras
2023-04-30  1:05     ` Teng Long
2023-05-06 11:27   ` [PATCH 0/1] push: introduce '--branches' option Teng Long
2023-05-06 11:27     ` [PATCH 1/1] " Teng Long
2023-05-06 11:36     ` [PATCH 0/1] " Teng Long
2022-12-05 23:35 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] push: introduce '--heads' option Junio C Hamano
2022-12-15 12:27   ` Teng Long
2023-04-28  9:59   ` Teng Long
2023-04-28 18:48     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-30  1:09       ` Teng Long [this message]
2023-05-06 11:34 ` [PATCH 0/1] push: introduce '--branches' option Teng Long
2023-05-06 11:34   ` [PATCH 1/1] " Teng Long
2023-05-06 21:39     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-07  6:43       ` Teng Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230430010948.4396-1-tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com \
    --to=dyroneteng@gmail.com \
    --cc=--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).