From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AD51F4C1 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 12:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Prm/FXCC"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231560AbiK1Mab (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 07:30:31 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42048 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231618AbiK1MaK (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 07:30:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 169901D66E for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 04:29:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id w129so10294972pfb.5 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 04:29:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=cdVFBIRNZhXRIwbSCAcNw6hKPFbss+QQUpIqLojyEpI=; b=Prm/FXCCZrKOrNucQMJpSSDKe97ucjyOu41QcwWryOOhMjdJr89hc5zopzVlsDE4Cz +li7jBu9pD/IYbU1jsoywF08dHHj4qaANFBi0IuuqxmzhgAZVqqTivWbEkA+GZ3ATkJs 33mTcWuFU3AiNBOObW6x4JJ8g7SH52YDrpxJ/MGtcL/8cjL4g6FgJK1TbITAxPBWTBmh PNg44kkyK78eGO4m8o2tAzNbuyT2BoW//nMaROmjEh0orRS4nuOeG6nKvb5bc1BCI5J0 EpTYd6fkhbCGTRiWVwJquU+XIKsPesY9rTcEypExQcSsepb8hZQbBwnG/ErmD+SgyDk4 eeig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cdVFBIRNZhXRIwbSCAcNw6hKPFbss+QQUpIqLojyEpI=; b=IVZQUzmQ8t9L3uxXHB1OqZrIRO/TIfjlxun07op7jy3zBA2zpLc79n/kwXMqMMvMGN E+yAuwHcPRgTm550bS+pvK2kbylSUKRfPp0AmZ37Ih6Dbp7Epibr7tR9BAhajU7jT+0N Y2UgNsx5FuAfcJz2wxK8hRtYFfmANOauILPvw65FSX6jxjdJBZCG4yPqZ3yXzN7jPOo0 CSQhOfVr1/o9Uuyld88lN4/wb67IIbFouPKysa4sGpjTtEyXmkenCwtzM/iu/KNTwVl8 TRnbrINesr8XOVdexGEUvqmgLE+G/zkrTsEj6658pH7XzrjVwIlKS9IJDhfuXJJi/DPq zk6g== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pllTFBUzC1wcNM8dGZ4wfOlczuTAybLmsFRNQqEWm53m7u+kYUZ 5d2vOCfPjGeZDAP2xew73w4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6T7FMD3DZmito9j/RKPVougOV6g5JLkHjxcjRdrN7GzMm6XQlHA6GcEr+8z64K2M9SmUTpBQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:4c0b:b0:562:ebc8:6195 with SMTP id ea11-20020a056a004c0b00b00562ebc86195mr31704682pfb.38.1669638565340; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 04:29:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([47.246.101.57]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u13-20020a170902e80d00b00189947bd9f7sm626545plg.50.2022.11.28.04.29.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 04:29:24 -0800 (PST) From: Teng Long X-Google-Original-From: Teng Long To: gitster@pobox.com Cc: avarab@gmail.com, derrickstolee@github.com, dyroneteng@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org, me@ttaylorr.com, peff@peff.net, tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] pack-bitmap.c: trace bitmap ignore logs when midx-bitmap is found Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 20:29:13 +0800 Message-Id: <20221128122913.53518-1-tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1.473.ga0789512c5a.dirty In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano write: > Thanks for all these good suggestions. > > As you pointed out, the first two seems to be identical to what > Taylor queued in 'next' already (so they do not have to be re-sent > but it is not a huge deal if they did---it would be a huge deal if > they were rewritten, though), and both of the two follow-on patches > make sense with suggested (minor) updates. I'll expect a reroll > before queuing these two and mark the topic in 'next' to be waiting > for them. Sorry, Not online for a few days last week. Will send a reroll today. Thanks.