From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2221F4D7 for ; Mon, 16 May 2022 15:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="GMAP5PM7"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245430AbiEPPjP (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2022 11:39:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43872 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245410AbiEPPjM (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2022 11:39:12 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 827443C726 for ; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id l20-20020a17090a409400b001dd2a9d555bso14812339pjg.0 for ; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:39:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PLbo1OE1HvETwlLc7rfeyIctioVQkX2Csrrjha+RChU=; b=GMAP5PM7c2NKgDE30ogCVzwDsZgo23NRu1xMjssbq3ld5DSH01at4cMnIlxPwP4Mmc l2+UC5YuO3YqFGNqCAsQ99pzwNDZAElw0p91l0L9IcHGZkjiZ5iSwF/e1o/aXLeIaIyC b8j9uE2B1iIp72HDRIeyN5UEM8wFZJNlB0F5JmjZrW9FNCp1gLSbye1mwG8EkT2+OwF3 SExzKCt55EopYpLQpz1M2zdTpqr1G8V//YWBlwS3kd5ciAbuOxHPz3CZcHjtq+ht1s2Y TXR0Vzcg/7nPTWKuo2QB/y5iJ+4ooI6OFhUXUh1lliMOHJZTCo+4O36vchUIl7lGSpYR DfAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PLbo1OE1HvETwlLc7rfeyIctioVQkX2Csrrjha+RChU=; b=i5dpM5HpmIrAA7e4FoqRju8Z37Q8Y6i/iQmNOgLQoPYGbjluve9DH1uSsjROaETiRV CGTbyOUojtiUqXt6ttFb6Vx2dESsjDGgQTGolKXs3q1P9bQx3STOASnvXqeqFKZEcp88 NQXAPNEEJ7k5uZMSBbcY+mk29Eiyl4FPHODGba1ok3P+sYA/5fIA1upyB2jsmetn6yuD cSK6fT4WjXMjTIDqekMKhleSplQYY/0Uh4yuODJetvLZeFVH+uKqZbOWc7oTFzNwvgCi R40UWVJIq0tZdhg9/kXzqe0TjjcZKQQLOmJ/xOkCzVY24jUSeLQHqevQwWJ8s4RH3S5J olBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+UxHyyKAGxCXrxVnhHGYT7/Twz9KuXPmPhP+z431fuflUYxKr BrgyelxvOHOG0piS20zmCZA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXGfJyeZLZVCqNDxYGy3L/Mu37frwE1kiCZ2YkiQ7/jiYFTBZXXhOQqyvqvYTujB5x34JEvg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d482:b0:15e:a06a:db0a with SMTP id c2-20020a170902d48200b0015ea06adb0amr18613433plg.38.1652715550836; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2409:4061:580:30b3:94c3:fc01:afb3:2509]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x6-20020a170902ea8600b0015e8d4eb2d8sm7107090plb.290.2022.05.16.08.39.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 May 2022 08:39:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Abhradeep Chakraborty To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Abhradeep Chakraborty , Git , Taylor Blau , Philip Oakley , Philippe Blain Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] builtin/remote.c: teach `-v` to list filters for promisor remotes Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 21:08:46 +0530 Message-Id: <20220516153846.18092-1-chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano wrote: > If majority of partial-clone users find it unnecessary noise, then > it may be an upside to give only reduced summary that is less than > full that may be given by `remote -v -v`. Should I add this to `remote -v -v` then? `remote -vv` is currently not implemented I guess. > Perhaps tagged output that can be easier to parse would be better > "extensible" output format for adding more random pieces of > information than going tabular. I dunno. I am not sure what exactly you are refering by 'tagged output' but it is true that tabular form is hard to parse. That's why I suggested `--raw` flag which would be used for parsing. It would give the info following the currently implemented format. If you like the tagged output format, then should we implement `-vv` which would give the output as the tagged output format and also can be extended?