From: Fabian Stelzer <fs@gigacodes.de>
To: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>,
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] merge-tree: implement real merges
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 13:23:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220103122347.uba66kusy3ft7g2h@fs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9fc71f4511b163bec53616d82e8fe5214facf060.1640927044.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On 31.12.2021 05:04, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
>From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
>
>This adds the ability to perform real merges rather than just trivial
>merges (meaning handling three way content merges, recursive ancestor
>consolidation, renames, proper directory/file conflict handling, and so
>forth). However, unlike `git merge`, the working tree and index are
>left alone and no branch is updated.
>
>The only output is:
> - the toplevel resulting tree printed on stdout
> - exit status of 0 (clean) or 1 (conflicts present)
>
>This output is mean to be used by some higher level script, perhaps in a
>sequence of steps like this:
>
> NEWTREE=$(git merge-tree --real $BRANCH1 $BRANCH2)
> test $? -eq 0 || die "There were conflicts..."
> NEWCOMMIT=$(git commit-tree $NEWTREE -p $BRANCH1 $BRANCH2)
> git update-ref $BRANCH1 $NEWCOMMIT
>
>Note that higher level scripts may also want to access the
>conflict/warning messages normally output during a merge, or have quick
>access to a list of files with conflicts. That is not available in this
>preliminary implementation, but subsequent commits will add that
>ability.
>
>Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
>---
> Documentation/git-merge-tree.txt | 28 +++++++----
> builtin/merge-tree.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> t/t4301-merge-tree-real.sh | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> create mode 100755 t/t4301-merge-tree-real.sh
>
>diff --git a/Documentation/git-merge-tree.txt b/Documentation/git-merge-tree.txt
>index 58731c19422..5823938937f 100644
>--- a/Documentation/git-merge-tree.txt
>+++ b/Documentation/git-merge-tree.txt
>@@ -3,26 +3,34 @@ git-merge-tree(1)
>
> NAME
> ----
>-git-merge-tree - Show three-way merge without touching index
>+git-merge-tree - Perform merge without touching index or working tree
>
>
> SYNOPSIS
> --------
> [verse]
>+'git merge-tree' --real <branch1> <branch2>
> 'git merge-tree' <base-tree> <branch1> <branch2>
>
> DESCRIPTION
> -----------
>-Reads three tree-ish, and output trivial merge results and
>-conflicting stages to the standard output. This is similar to
>-what three-way 'git read-tree -m' does, but instead of storing the
>-results in the index, the command outputs the entries to the
>-standard output.
>+Performs a merge, but does not make any new commits and does not read
>+from or write to either the working tree or index.
>
>-This is meant to be used by higher level scripts to compute
>-merge results outside of the index, and stuff the results back into the
>-index. For this reason, the output from the command omits
>-entries that match the <branch1> tree.
>+The first form will merge the two branches, doing a full recursive
>+merge with rename detection. If the merge is clean, the exit status
>+will be `0`, and if the merge has conflicts, the exit status will be
>+`1`. The output will consist solely of the resulting toplevel tree
>+(which may have files including conflict markers).
>+
>+The second form is meant for backward compatibility and will only do a
>+trival merge. It reads three tree-ish, and outputs trivial merge
>+results and conflicting stages to the standard output in a semi-diff
>+format. Since this was designed for higher level scripts to consume
>+and merge the results back into the index, it omits entries that match
>+<branch1>. The result of this second form is is similar to what
>+three-way 'git read-tree -m' does, but instead of storing the results
>+in the index, the command outputs the entries to the standard output.
>
> GIT
> ---
>diff --git a/builtin/merge-tree.c b/builtin/merge-tree.c
>index f04b1eaad0a..c5757bed5bb 100644
>--- a/builtin/merge-tree.c
>+++ b/builtin/merge-tree.c
>@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
> #include "builtin.h"
> #include "tree-walk.h"
> #include "xdiff-interface.h"
>+#include "help.h"
>+#include "commit-reach.h"
>+#include "merge-ort.h"
> #include "object-store.h"
> #include "parse-options.h"
> #include "repository.h"
>@@ -391,7 +394,57 @@ struct merge_tree_options {
> static int real_merge(struct merge_tree_options *o,
> const char *branch1, const char *branch2)
> {
>- die(_("real merges are not yet implemented"));
>+ struct commit *parent1, *parent2;
>+ struct commit_list *common;
>+ struct commit_list *merge_bases = NULL;
>+ struct commit_list *j;
>+ struct merge_options opt;
>+ struct merge_result result = { 0 };
>+
>+ parent1 = get_merge_parent(branch1);
>+ if (!parent1)
>+ help_unknown_ref(branch1, "merge",
>+ _("not something we can merge"));
>+
>+ parent2 = get_merge_parent(branch2);
>+ if (!parent2)
>+ help_unknown_ref(branch2, "merge",
>+ _("not something we can merge"));
>+
>+ init_merge_options(&opt, the_repository);
>+ /*
>+ * TODO: Support subtree and other -X options?
>+ if (use_strategies_nr == 1 &&
>+ !strcmp(use_strategies[0]->name, "subtree"))
>+ opt.subtree_shift = "";
>+ for (x = 0; x < xopts_nr; x++)
>+ if (parse_merge_opt(&opt, xopts[x]))
>+ die(_("Unknown strategy option: -X%s"), xopts[x]);
>+ */
>+
>+ opt.show_rename_progress = 0;
>+
>+ opt.branch1 = merge_remote_util(parent1)->name; /* or just branch1? */
>+ opt.branch2 = merge_remote_util(parent2)->name; /* or just branch2? */
>+
>+ /*
>+ * Get the merge bases, in reverse order; see comment above
>+ * merge_incore_recursive in merge-ort.h
>+ */
>+ common = get_merge_bases(parent1, parent2);
>+ for (j = common; j; j = j->next)
>+ commit_list_insert(j->item, &merge_bases);
>+
>+ /*
>+ * TODO: notify if merging unrelated histories?
>+ if (!common)
>+ fprintf(stderr, _("merging unrelated histories"));
>+ */
>+
>+ merge_incore_recursive(&opt, merge_bases, parent1, parent2, &result);
>+ printf("%s\n", oid_to_hex(&result.tree->object.oid));
>+ merge_switch_to_result(&opt, NULL, &result, 0, 0);
>+ return result.clean ? 0 : 1;
> }
>
> int cmd_merge_tree(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>diff --git a/t/t4301-merge-tree-real.sh b/t/t4301-merge-tree-real.sh
>new file mode 100755
>index 00000000000..9fb617ccc7f
>--- /dev/null
>+++ b/t/t4301-merge-tree-real.sh
>@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
>+#!/bin/sh
>+
>+test_description='git merge-tree --real'
>+
>+. ./test-lib.sh
>+
>+# This test is ort-specific
>+GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM=ort
>+export GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM
>+
>+test_expect_success setup '
>+ test_write_lines 1 2 3 4 5 >numbers &&
>+ echo hello >greeting &&
>+ echo foo >whatever &&
>+ git add numbers greeting whatever &&
>+ git commit -m initial &&
>+
>+ git branch side1 &&
>+ git branch side2 &&
>+
>+ git checkout side1 &&
>+ test_write_lines 1 2 3 4 5 6 >numbers &&
>+ echo hi >greeting &&
>+ echo bar >whatever &&
>+ git add numbers greeting whatever &&
>+ git commit -m rename-and-modify &&
The commit implies a rename as well which I think is missing.
>+
>+ git checkout side2 &&
>+ test_write_lines 0 1 2 3 4 5 >numbers &&
>+ echo yo >greeting &&
>+ git rm whatever &&
>+ mkdir whatever &&
>+ >whatever/empty &&
>+ git add numbers greeting whatever/empty &&
>+ git commit -m remove-and-rename
And this looks more like a remove-and-modify. Is it still a rename when we
empty the files content?
>+'
>+
>+test_expect_success 'Content merge and a few conflicts' '
>+ git checkout side1^0 &&
>+ test_must_fail git merge side2 &&
>+ cp .git/AUTO_MERGE EXPECT &&
>+ E_TREE=$(cat EXPECT) &&
>+
>+ git reset --hard &&
>+ test_must_fail git merge-tree --real side1 side2 >RESULT &&
>+ R_TREE=$(cat RESULT) &&
>+
>+ # Due to differences of e.g. "HEAD" vs "side1", the results will not
>+ # exactly match. Dig into individual files.
>+
>+ # Numbers should have three-way merged cleanly
>+ test_write_lines 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 >expect &&
>+ git show ${R_TREE}:numbers >actual &&
>+ test_cmp expect actual &&
>+
>+ # whatever and whatever~<branch> should have same HASHES
>+ git rev-parse ${E_TREE}:whatever ${E_TREE}:whatever~HEAD >expect &&
>+ git rev-parse ${R_TREE}:whatever ${R_TREE}:whatever~side1 >actual &&
>+ test_cmp expect actual &&
>+
>+ # greeting should have a merge conflict
>+ git show ${E_TREE}:greeting >tmp &&
>+ cat tmp | sed -e s/HEAD/side1/ >expect &&
>+ git show ${R_TREE}:greeting >actual &&
>+ test_cmp expect actual
>+'
>+
>+test_expect_success 'Barf on misspelled option' '
>+ # Mis-spell with single "s" instead of double "s"
>+ test_expect_code 129 git merge-tree --real --mesages FOOBAR side1 side2 2>expect &&
>+
>+ grep "error: unknown option.*mesages" expect
>+'
>+
>+test_expect_success 'Barf on too many arguments' '
>+ test_expect_code 129 git merge-tree --real side1 side2 side3 2>expect &&
>+
>+ grep "^usage: git merge-tree" expect
>+'
>+
>+test_done
>--
>gitgitgadget
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-03 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-31 5:03 [PATCH 0/8] RFC: Server side merges (no ref updating, no commit creating, no touching worktree or index) Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-12-31 5:03 ` [PATCH 1/8] merge-tree: rename merge_trees() to trivial_merge_trees() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-12-31 5:03 ` [PATCH 2/8] merge-tree: move logic for existing merge into new function Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-01 20:11 ` Johannes Altmanninger
2022-01-01 20:17 ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-31 5:03 ` [PATCH 3/8] merge-tree: add option parsing and initial shell for real merge function Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2021-12-31 5:04 ` [PATCH 4/8] merge-tree: implement real merges Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-01 20:08 ` Johannes Altmanninger
2022-01-01 21:11 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-03 12:23 ` Fabian Stelzer [this message]
2022-01-03 16:37 ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-31 5:04 ` [PATCH 5/8] merge-ort: split out a separate display_update_messages() function Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-03 12:15 ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-03 12:25 ` Fabian Stelzer
2021-12-31 5:04 ` [PATCH 6/8] merge-ort: allow update messages to be written to different file stream Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-01 20:08 ` Johannes Altmanninger
2022-01-01 20:19 ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-31 5:04 ` [PATCH 7/8] merge-tree: support saving merge messages to a separate file Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-03 12:31 ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-03 16:51 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-03 17:22 ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-03 19:46 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-04 13:05 ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-03 12:35 ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-03 16:55 ` Elijah Newren
2021-12-31 5:04 ` [PATCH 8/8] merge-tree: provide an easy way to access which files have conflicts Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] RFC: Server side merges (no ref updating, no commit creating, no touching worktree or index) Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] merge-tree: rename merge_trees() to trivial_merge_trees() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] merge-tree: move logic for existing merge into new function Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] merge-tree: add option parsing and initial shell for real merge function Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] merge-tree: implement real merges Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-07 15:30 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-07 17:26 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-07 18:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-07 19:15 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-07 20:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-11 13:39 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-07 18:12 ` Christian Couder
2022-01-07 19:09 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] merge-ort: split out a separate display_update_messages() function Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] merge-ort: allow update messages to be written to different file stream Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] merge-tree: support saving merge messages to a separate file Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-07 18:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-08 1:02 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-05 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] merge-tree: provide an easy way to access which files have conflicts Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 19:09 ` Ramsay Jones
2022-01-05 19:17 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-07 19:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-07 22:12 ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-22 13:03 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-08 1:28 ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-22 13:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-05 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] RFC: Server side merges (no ref updating, no commit creating, no touching worktree or index) Junio C Hamano
2022-01-05 22:35 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-07 18:46 ` Christian Couder
2022-01-07 19:59 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-07 21:26 ` René Scharfe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220103122347.uba66kusy3ft7g2h@fs \
--to=fs@gigacodes.de \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).