From: Fabian Stelzer <fs@gigacodes.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2021, #05; Fri, 19)
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 12:18:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211120111842.mrryee6kvffhpegs@fs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa6hznvz1.fsf@gitster.g>
On 19.11.2021 23:10, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>* fs/ssh-signing-other-keytypes (2021-11-19) 2 commits
> - ssh signing: make sign/amend test more resilient
> - ssh signing: support non ssh-* keytypes
>
>
>* fs/ssh-signing-key-lifetime (2021-11-18) 10 commits
> - ssh signing: verify ssh-keygen in test prereq
> - ssh signing: make fmt-merge-msg consider key lifetime
> - ssh signing: make verify-tag consider key lifetime
> - ssh signing: make git log verify key lifetime
> - ssh signing: make verify-commit consider key lifetime
> - ssh signing: add key lifetime test prereqs
> - ssh signing: use sigc struct to pass payload
> - Merge branch 'ad/ssh-signing-testfix' into fs/ssh-signing-key-lifetime
> - Merge branch 'fs/ssh-signing-fix' into fs/ssh-signing-key-lifetime
> - Merge branch 'fs/ssh-signing' into fs/ssh-signing-key-lifetime
>
> Extend the signing of objects with SSH keys and learn to pay
> attention to the key validity time range when verifying.
>
> Will merge to 'next'?
>
I have some cleanup / code style changes for the ssh siginig test prereq
code like you suggested in
https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqfsrssmar.fsf@gitster.g/ that would
conflict between these two series. Depending on which lands first or if
the keytpye fix goes into `maint` I could apply it to either one and
rebase the other. Or since it's just style changes I can attach it to
some future ssh signing series. I don't mind either way. Otherwise I
think this is ready for `next`.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-20 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-20 7:10 What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2021, #05; Fri, 19) Junio C Hamano
2021-11-20 11:18 ` Fabian Stelzer [this message]
2021-11-20 17:30 ` Elijah Newren
2021-11-20 22:20 ` vd/sparse-reset (Was: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2021, #05; Fri, 19)) Elijah Newren
2021-11-21 2:00 ` What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2021, #05; Fri, 19) Elijah Newren
2021-11-22 17:59 ` vd/sparse-sparsity-fix-on-read (Was: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2021, #05; Fri, 19)) Elijah Newren
2021-11-22 18:00 ` What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2021, #05; Fri, 19) Glen Choo
2021-11-22 18:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-11-22 22:36 ` Glen Choo
2021-11-23 13:22 ` ab/mark-leak-free-tests-even-more (was: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2021, #05; Fri, 19)) Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211120111842.mrryee6kvffhpegs@fs \
--to=fs@gigacodes.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).