git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Rafael Silva <rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>,
	"Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
	"Jonathan Tan" <jonathantanmy@google.com>,
	"Rafael Silva" <rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] prevent `repack` to unpack and delete promisor objects
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:14:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210414191403.4387-1-rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210403090412.GH2271@szeder.dev>

This series is built on top of jk/promisor-optim. It conflicts with
changes on p5600 otherwise.

The following patches fixes the issue where we unnecessarily turn loose
all the promisor objects and deletes them right after when running
`repack -A -d ..` (via `git gc) for a partial repository. 

Special thanks to Peff, for proposing a better approach for managing
the situation and for Jonathan Tan for earlier interaction on the
solution. Previously, I thought we should skip the promisor objects
by just adding a check in loosened_object_can_be_discarded(). However,
Peff pointed out that we can do better by realizing much sooner that
we should not even consider loosening the objects for the _old_ promisor
packs.

It took me a bit to come up with the test because it seems `repack`
doesn't offer an option to skip the "deletion of unpacked objects",
so this series adds a new option to `repack` for skip the
`git prune-packed` execution thus allowing us to easily inspect the
unpacked objects before they are removed and simplification of our
test suite. Furthermore, The test will now test the `repack` code
path instead of performing the operations by calling
`pack-objects`.

Rafael Silva (2):
  repack: teach --no-prune-packed to skip `git prune-packed`
  repack: avoid loosening promisor pack objects in partial clones

 Documentation/git-repack.txt  |  5 +++++
 builtin/repack.c              | 15 ++++++++++++---
 t/perf/p5600-partial-clone.sh |  4 ++++
 t/t5616-partial-clone.sh      |  9 +++++++++
 t/t7700-repack.sh             | 23 +++++++++++------------
 5 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.0.565.gcc42f43761


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-14 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-03  9:04 rather slow 'git repack' in 'blob:none' partial clones SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-05  1:02 ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-07 21:17   ` Jeff King
2021-04-08  0:02     ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-08  0:35       ` Jeff King
2021-04-12  7:09     ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-12 21:36     ` SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-12 21:49       ` Bryan Turner
2021-04-12 23:51         ` Jeff King
2021-04-12 23:47       ` Jeff King
2021-04-13  7:12         ` [PATCH 0/3] low-hanging performance fruit with promisor packs Jeff King
2021-04-13  7:15           ` [PATCH 1/3] is_promisor_object(): free tree buffer after parsing Jeff King
2021-04-13 20:17             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-14  5:18               ` Jeff King
2021-04-13  7:16           ` [PATCH 2/3] lookup_unknown_object(): take a repository argument Jeff King
2021-04-13  7:17           ` [PATCH 3/3] revision: avoid parsing with --exclude-promisor-objects Jeff King
2021-04-13 20:22             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-13 18:10           ` [PATCH 0/3] low-hanging performance fruit with promisor packs SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-14 17:14           ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-14 19:22           ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-13 18:05         ` rather slow 'git repack' in 'blob:none' partial clones SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-14  5:14           ` Jeff King
2021-04-11 10:59   ` SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-12  7:53     ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 19:14 ` Rafael Silva [this message]
2021-04-14 19:14   ` [PATCH 1/2] repack: teach --no-prune-packed to skip `git prune-packed` Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 23:50     ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-18 14:15       ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 19:14   ` [PATCH 2/2] repack: avoid loosening promisor pack objects in partial clones Rafael Silva
2021-04-15  1:04     ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-15  3:51       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-15  9:03         ` Jeff King
2021-04-15  9:05       ` Jeff King
2021-04-18  7:12       ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-15 18:06     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-18  8:40       ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 22:10   ` [PATCH 0/2] prevent `repack` to unpack and delete promisor objects Junio C Hamano
2021-04-15  9:15   ` Jeff King
2021-04-18  8:20     ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-18 13:57   ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Rafael Silva
2021-04-18 13:57     ` [PATCH v2 1/1] repack: avoid loosening promisor objects in partial clones Rafael Silva
2021-04-19 19:15       ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-21 18:54         ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-19 23:09       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-21 19:25         ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-21 19:32     ` [PATCH v3] " Rafael Silva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210414191403.4387-1-rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com \
    --to=rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).