From: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
To: gitster@pobox.com
Cc: jonathantanmy@google.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] push: perform negotiation before sending packfile
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:42:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210219004242.1179999-1-jonathantanmy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy2fldsy4.fsf@gitster.g>
> For a real implementation, I think we'd want to do the negotiation
> inside the conversation between send-pack and receive-pack, so that
> what is agreed to be common between two parties will not shift in
> the middle (in the same spirit that upload-pack grabs all the
> relevant refs first, advertises them, negotiates what is common and
> creates a pack, all using the same worldview of where the tips of
> refs are throughout the process, even if some refs change in the
> meantime).
Upload-pack does that for protocol v0 ssh:// and git:// but not
http(s)://, and does not do that for protocol v2, I believe.
If we were to do that, I don't think it would work for the transports
that have are stateless (e.g. HTTP). Also, this seems like it would
involve a significant reworking of how the server serves (receive-pack
would need to know to communicate just like upload-pack does temporarily
before proceeding with its usual behavior, and the client would need to
learn this new way - as opposed to the idea in this patch to do it
separately and reuse the already existing fetch and push mechanisms). I
think the greater complexity is not worth it for something that won't
work in HTTP, but I'm open to other opinions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-19 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-18 1:21 [RFC PATCH] push: perform negotiation before sending packfile Jonathan Tan
2021-02-18 1:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-18 20:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-18 21:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-19 0:42 ` Jonathan Tan [this message]
2021-02-20 3:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-22 20:01 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-02-22 21:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-18 23:02 ` Jonathan Tan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210219004242.1179999-1-jonathantanmy@google.com \
--to=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).