Re: Code of conduct violation?

[Pratyush Yadav <me@yadavpratyush.com>]

Hi Felipe,

On 21/12/20 05:51PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> David Aguilar wrote:
> > Just a heads-up that Felipe has a history on this list of creating
> > long, never-ending, pointless rant threads so sometimes the best
> > course of action is to ignore him.

While calling someone out like this is not the right thing at all, it is 
a good opportunity for some introspection. I do not participate in the 
threads you do so I can't say much about these "never-ending, pointless 
rant threads". But if enough people feel this way, maybe you need to 
dial it down a bit. The community needs to do its part in making you and 
everyone else feel welcome. At the same time you need to do your part in 
making contributors, especially the new ones, feel welcome and 
appreciated. Being overly critical can turn developers away from the 
project.

Anyway, those are my 2 cents. Do with them what you will.
 
> I think this can be considered a personal attack, which goes against the
> code of conduct.
> 
> The code of conduct suggests behavior like:
> 
>  * Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
>  * Showing empathy towards other community members
> 
> It seems to me the above comment is an example of the opposite.
> 
> If you feel that my feedback is pointless, then don't engage with it.
> There's no need to put aggravating labels, especially on a public
> setting. Even if most people agree with you.
> 
> I tolerate your opinion, but it's just that; an opinion.
> 
> I think you should treat it as such (an opinion), and not blatantly
> disregard the viewpoints of people you disagree with, and worse;
> publicly suggest others do the same.
> 
> The Git project engages in outreach programs precisely to increase the
> diversity of the project, and this interest should not exclude diversity
> of thought. Seems counterproductive to allow these kinds of attacks
> against a minority opinion. It is in fact the minority opinion that
> needs protection, the majority opinion can defend itself.
> 

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav