Re: [PATCH 0/2] git-gui: Auto-rescan on activate

[Pratyush Yadav <me@yadavpratyush.com>]

Hi,

On 17/12/20 08:45PM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 01.11.20 um 18:05 schrieb Stefan Haller:
> > Do an automatic rescan whenever the git-gui window receives focus. Most other
> > GUI tools do this, and it's very convenient; no more pressing F5 manually.
> > 
> > People who don't like this behavior can turn it off using
> > "git config gui.autorescan false".
> > 
> > Stefan Haller (2):
> >   git-gui: Delay rescan until idle time
> >   git-gui: Auto-rescan on activate
> > 
> >  git-gui.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> I've been using these patches in the past days.
> 
> I am still a bit ambivalent on whether I like the behavior. I do switch
> among windows *a lot* and there is a short flicker on every rescan. And
> there is muscle memory...

This is part of the reason I am a little uneasy enabling it by default, 
and why I insist on having a loud and clear warning to the users about 
what is going on.
 
> I observe a bug and a half:
> 
> It is unclear which file is selected automatically when there are
> unstaged changes. But there is one misbehavior: after I have invoked the
> merge tool, resolved the conflict, and then switch back to Git GUI, the
> conflicted file is not selected anymore when it is not the first file in
> the list. That is *very* annoying.

Haven't had a chance to try this out yet but AFAIK the last file should 
be correctly remembered. See below.
 
> And then there is the following use-case. While Git GUI is not active
> (think Git GUI and Gitk side-by-side and Gitk active), I click on a
> particular file that is not at the top of the list; then Git GUI becomes
> active and rescans, but also forgets on which file I have clicked. But I
> expected the clicked-on file to become visible, which it doesn't, and I
> have to click again. This is mildly annoying.

Hmm, I don't see that on my system on Linux. The code to remember last 
open file is there in 'rescan_done'. So I don't understand why this 
becomes a problem on your system.

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav