From: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
To: gitster@pobox.com
Cc: jonathantanmy@google.com, git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net,
felipe.contreras@gmail.com, avarab@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ls-refs: report unborn targets of symrefs
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:49:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201216234914.1671487-1-jonathantanmy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq1rfq5l8x.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
> > @@ -74,8 +79,28 @@ static int send_ref(const char *refname, const struct object_id *oid,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int ls_refs_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *data)
> > +static void send_possibly_unborn_head(struct ls_refs_data *data)
> > {
> > + struct strbuf namespaced = STRBUF_INIT;
> > + struct object_id oid;
> > + int flag;
> > + int null_oid;
>
> I'd suggest renaming this one, which masks the global null_oid of
> "const struct object_id" type. This code does not break only
> because is_null_oid() happens to be implemented as a static inline,
> and not as a C-preprocessor macro, right?
OK - will rename.
> > + strbuf_addf(&namespaced, "%sHEAD", get_git_namespace());
> > + resolve_ref_unsafe(namespaced.buf, 0, &oid, &flag);
> > + null_oid = is_null_oid(&oid);
> > + if (!null_oid || (data->symrefs && (flag & REF_ISSYMREF)))
> > + send_ref(namespaced.buf, null_oid ? NULL : &oid, flag, data);
> > + strbuf_release(&namespaced);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ls_refs_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb_data)
> > +{
> > + struct ls_refs_data *data = cb_data;
> > +
> > + if (!strcmp("lsrefs.unborn", var))
> > + data->allow_unborn = !strcmp(value, "allow") ||
> > + !strcmp(value, "advertise");
>
> Are there differences between allow and advertise? Would
> lsrefs.allowUnborn that is a boolean, thus allowing the value to be
> parsed by git_config_bool(), make more sense here, I wonder. Or is
> this meant as some future enhancement, e.g. you plan to have some
> servers that allow "unborn" request even though they do not actively
> advertise the support of the feature? Without documentation update
> or an in-code comment, it is rather hard to guess the intention
> here.
I'll update the documentation. With this current patch, yes, some
servers will allow "unborn" requests even though they do not actively
advertise it. This allows servers in load-balanced environments to first
be configured to support the feature, then after ensuring that the
configuration for all servers is complete, to turn on advertisement.
> > @@ -91,7 +116,7 @@ int ls_refs(struct repository *r, struct strvec *keys,
> >
> > memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data));
> >
> > - git_config(ls_refs_config, NULL);
> > + git_config(ls_refs_config, &data);
> >
> > while (packet_reader_read(request) == PACKET_READ_NORMAL) {
> > const char *arg = request->line;
> > @@ -103,14 +128,35 @@ int ls_refs(struct repository *r, struct strvec *keys,
> > data.symrefs = 1;
> > else if (skip_prefix(arg, "ref-prefix ", &out))
> > strvec_push(&data.prefixes, out);
> > + else if (data.allow_unborn && !strcmp("unborn", arg))
> > + data.unborn = 1;
>
> Somehow, it appears to me that writing it in a way along with this
> line ...
>
> else if (!strcmp("unborn", arg))
> data.unborn = data.allow_unborn;
>
> ... would make more sense. Whether we allowed "unborn" request or
> not, when the other side says "unborn", we are handling the request
> for the unborn feature, and the condition with strcmp() alone
> signals that better (in other words, when we acquire more request
> types, we do not want to pass the control to "else if" clauses that
> may come after this part when we see "unborn" request and when we
> are configured not to accept "unborn" requests.
>
> It does not make any difference in the current code, of course, and
> it is more about future-proofing the cleanness of the code.
Good point. I'll go ahead and write it as you describe.
I was following the style in upload-pack, where writing it my way versus
your way would make a difference because we die on invalid arguments at
the end. (It does raise the question whether we should die on invalid
arguments, but maybe that's for another time.)
>
> > - head_ref_namespaced(send_ref, &data);
> > + if (data.unborn)
> > + send_possibly_unborn_head(&data);
> > + else
> > + head_ref_namespaced(send_ref, &data);
>
> I found the "send_possibly 70% duplicates what the more generic
> head_ref_namespaced() does" a bit disturbing.
There's more duplication in refs.c (e.g. head_ref_namespaced() and
refs_head_ref()) too. I'll see if I can refactor those into something
more generic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-16 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-08 1:31 Cloning empty repository uses locally configured default branch name Jonathan Tan
2020-12-08 2:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-08 2:32 ` brian m. carlson
2020-12-08 18:55 ` Jonathan Tan
2020-12-08 21:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-08 15:58 ` Jeff King
2020-12-08 20:06 ` Jonathan Tan
2020-12-08 21:15 ` Jeff King
2020-12-11 21:05 ` [PATCH] clone: in protocol v2, use remote's default branch Jonathan Tan
2020-12-11 23:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-14 12:38 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-12-14 15:51 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-14 16:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-15 1:41 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2020-12-15 2:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-15 2:38 ` Jeff King
2020-12-15 2:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-15 4:36 ` Jeff King
2020-12-16 3:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-16 18:39 ` Jeff King
2020-12-16 20:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-18 6:19 ` Jeff King
2020-12-15 3:22 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-14 19:25 ` Jonathan Tan
2020-12-14 19:42 ` Felipe Contreras
2020-12-15 1:27 ` Jeff King
2020-12-15 19:10 ` Jonathan Tan
2020-12-16 2:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Cloning with remote unborn HEAD Jonathan Tan
2020-12-16 2:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ls-refs: report unborn targets of symrefs Jonathan Tan
2020-12-16 6:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-16 23:49 ` Jonathan Tan [this message]
2020-12-16 18:23 ` Jeff King
2020-12-16 23:54 ` Jonathan Tan
2020-12-17 1:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-18 6:16 ` Jeff King
2020-12-16 2:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] connect, transport: add no-op arg for future patch Jonathan Tan
2020-12-16 6:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-16 2:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] clone: respect remote unborn HEAD Jonathan Tan
2020-12-21 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Cloning with " Jonathan Tan
2020-12-21 22:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ls-refs: report unborn targets of symrefs Jonathan Tan
2020-12-21 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] connect, transport: add no-op arg for future patch Jonathan Tan
2020-12-21 22:31 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] clone: respect remote unborn HEAD Jonathan Tan
2020-12-21 23:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Cloning with " Junio C Hamano
2021-01-21 20:14 ` Jeff King
2020-12-22 21:54 ` [PATCH v4 " Jonathan Tan
2020-12-22 21:54 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ls-refs: report unborn targets of symrefs Jonathan Tan
2021-01-21 20:48 ` Jeff King
2021-01-26 18:13 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-01-26 23:16 ` Jeff King
2020-12-22 21:54 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] connect, transport: add no-op arg for future patch Jonathan Tan
2021-01-21 20:55 ` Jeff King
2021-01-26 18:16 ` Jonathan Tan
2020-12-22 21:54 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] clone: respect remote unborn HEAD Jonathan Tan
2021-01-21 21:02 ` Jeff King
2021-01-26 18:22 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-01-26 23:04 ` Jeff King
2021-01-28 5:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-22 22:06 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Cloning with " Junio C Hamano
2021-01-26 18:55 ` [PATCH v5 " Jonathan Tan
2021-01-26 18:55 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ls-refs: report unborn targets of symrefs Jonathan Tan
2021-01-26 21:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-26 23:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-30 3:55 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-01-26 23:20 ` Jeff King
2021-01-26 23:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-29 20:23 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-01-29 22:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-02 2:20 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-02-02 5:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-27 1:28 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-01-30 4:04 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-01-26 18:55 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] connect, transport: encapsulate arg in struct Jonathan Tan
2021-01-26 21:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-30 4:06 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-01-26 18:55 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] clone: respect remote unborn HEAD Jonathan Tan
2021-01-26 22:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-30 4:27 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-01-27 1:11 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Cloning with " Junio C Hamano
2021-01-27 4:25 ` Jeff King
2021-01-27 6:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-27 1:41 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-01-30 4:41 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-01-30 11:13 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-02-02 2:22 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-02-03 14:23 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-02-05 22:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-02 2:14 ` [PATCH v6 " Jonathan Tan
2021-02-02 2:14 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] ls-refs: report unborn targets of symrefs Jonathan Tan
2021-02-02 16:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-02 18:34 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-02-02 22:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-03 1:04 ` Jonathan Tan
2021-02-02 2:15 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] connect, transport: encapsulate arg in struct Jonathan Tan
2021-02-02 2:15 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] clone: respect remote unborn HEAD Jonathan Tan
2021-02-05 4:58 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] Cloning with " Jonathan Tan
2021-02-05 4:58 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] ls-refs: report unborn targets of symrefs Jonathan Tan
2021-02-05 16:10 ` Jeff King
2021-02-05 4:58 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] connect, transport: encapsulate arg in struct Jonathan Tan
2021-02-05 4:58 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] clone: respect remote unborn HEAD Jonathan Tan
2021-02-05 5:25 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] Cloning with " Junio C Hamano
2021-02-05 16:15 ` Jeff King
2021-02-05 21:15 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-02-05 23:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-05 20:48 ` [PATCH v8 " Jonathan Tan
2021-02-05 20:48 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] ls-refs: report unborn targets of symrefs Jonathan Tan
2021-02-05 20:48 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] connect, transport: encapsulate arg in struct Jonathan Tan
2021-02-05 20:48 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] clone: respect remote unborn HEAD Jonathan Tan
2021-02-06 18:51 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] Cloning with " Junio C Hamano
2021-02-08 22:28 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201216234914.1671487-1-jonathantanmy@google.com \
--to=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).