From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AAA1F934 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 00:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726221AbgLPAe4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2020 19:34:56 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52740 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726141AbgLPAez (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2020 19:34:55 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x441.google.com (mail-pf1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::441]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2F56C061793 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:34:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x441.google.com with SMTP id w6so15532500pfu.1 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:34:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Cuv0JfhoEH1uF78hUabZelZIb6JRKaK5k1DNR6Zk7YI=; b=RkBbe6pSHd4QOHSr5lymMWkm5+1nqQD2frA8Kwoh3ZFIzvxADJ6wji84KzeA2Y59B9 UmuSgA/VoffV+o/WoQNlMHX+fvIohlp7evyNwtNELV6Uh3ABua1h8vePP/B+4hdC1Bf/ 4hb8i4gMBg234o9TSJxNVmt8f5VFDkAZMKcpdd0Gl/wqZBJZc7riFEYJbRBpgrJvsIXF eWxjBYzAaqNLiyj8PdO4pmXQvb84sEyDTqqrqMjeVRSHZz7f3pnUDYNYwQVtkSeEW2MR dPRsOmZ0i9253g3d7Jzvk+E8EzujF5rl+PmOcHi9mu621NMPtW920UUz41n4vXbtHQfH fC3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to; bh=Cuv0JfhoEH1uF78hUabZelZIb6JRKaK5k1DNR6Zk7YI=; b=K4Bhcx7FvlDyXMJeArg+FN5Dw4mXyc+wk2YnL2SJKEljcf+nosjhypbNNPra3JYwo+ 3AjJ5MdZU6GSJWHTrRgZYNgN24nl63+bt3wlJPaS3D0CTyGcgfsQff5KlrkcA3ah9pNZ oqBjCVWdoLPPqnApKF/EbIMeU8ZcyP1QXikiZVmkg/uK+i7g9OL4yQx+zu3M04y+4s6A LkjbnC5Mi98ANYmcHkQdnOASupnchkSI9YxRKzFMHfDzyFe4CntLkf/Nh2EkP/jqBgHo hxxZx6ie8MhleB88u18mIWsDAqIUQAfBkcqcjNa+vjBLgNYdPR0ClQkJRs4f2rBKNzJn 3e7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530fiCJOghO0BrSZgE2EAQa2WkWTpmgetqT720zFn/yEAnDNc08x S6Or9u4R5M30hNtk3JYqRP5RUg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4tn3Cg+qvFQ+sGaucgKChHFUHNvh+6EP6nvPDTnLCUZuYeQqq2iKmbt5wtPnzh0lGwSnRMw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9ab7:0:b029:19d:ac89:39aa with SMTP id x23-20020aa79ab70000b029019dac8939aamr23682170pfi.10.1608078854435; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:34:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:2ce:200:1ea0:b8ff:fe74:b4c1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p187sm157249pfp.60.2020.12.15.16.34.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:34:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:34:08 -0800 From: Josh Steadmon To: Emily Shaffer Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Junio C Hamano , James Ramsay , Jonathan Nieder , "brian m. carlson" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C6var_Arnfj=F6r=F0?= Bjarmason , Phillip Wood , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] propose config-based hooks (part I) Message-ID: <20201216003408.GR36751@google.com> Mail-Followup-To: Josh Steadmon , Emily Shaffer , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Junio C Hamano , James Ramsay , Jonathan Nieder , "brian m. carlson" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C6var_Arnfj=F6r=F0?= Bjarmason , Phillip Wood , Johannes Schindelin References: <20201014232447.3050579-1-emilyshaffer@google.com> <20201205014607.1464119-1-emilyshaffer@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201205014607.1464119-1-emilyshaffer@google.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 2020.12.04 17:45, Emily Shaffer wrote: > Hi folks, and thanks for the patience - I ran into many, many last-mile > challenges. > > I haven't addressed many comments on the design doc yet - I was keen to get the > "functionally complete" implementation and conversion to the list. > > Next on my plate: > - Update the design doc to make sense with what's in the implementation. > - A blog post! How to set up new hooks, why they're neat, etc. > - We seem to have some Googlers interested in trying it out internally, so > I'm hoping we'll gather and collate feedback from that soon too. > - And of course addressing comments on this series. > > Thanks! > - Emily This approach looks good to me. I'll look forward to seeing the updated design and the feedback from the internal tests.