From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019EE1F66F for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:07:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726048AbgKKUHC (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 15:07:02 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:55228 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725860AbgKKUHC (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 15:07:02 -0500 Received: (qmail 14432 invoked by uid 109); 11 Nov 2020 20:07:02 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:07:02 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 20846 invoked by uid 111); 11 Nov 2020 20:07:01 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 15:07:01 -0500 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 15:07:01 -0500 From: Jeff King To: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren , Phillip Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/15] Add struct strmap and associated utility functions Message-ID: <20201111200701.GB39046@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 08:02:06PM +0000, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote: > Here I introduce new strmap, strintmap, and strset types. > > Changes since v5: > > * Fixed a typo in forward declaration of struct mem_pool, spotted by > Phillip. (Usage via pointers meant gcc & clang wouldn't complain.) Yep, this version looks good to me. I think this is probably ready for 'next'. -Peff