From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED5B1FF9C for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1789475AbgJZSQ3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:16:29 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f177.google.com ([209.85.222.177]:43532 "EHLO mail-qk1-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1789472AbgJZSQ3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:16:29 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f177.google.com with SMTP id q199so9257003qke.10 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:16:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version :content-disposition; bh=5AR6GEnXLBpG43hAtbEpQBS8XwUl2rwfzRWPOyYs4L8=; b=FCfYM/BVzSULIGMImT1vPoNgvbdEzAhMCIo0yN0GjFhq+0vNi3+mVjZLesUCh1eoFy OQqGWC+CfCyN3aixkIBcxlyLarPa7e1TCBHrfEND9td5kPAMdXY+knWXvJjckJNX9xnN a/8sEmuUTLQ7a6Z8QcK9Y7lJREp1HB9ZkgZZs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :mime-version:content-disposition; bh=5AR6GEnXLBpG43hAtbEpQBS8XwUl2rwfzRWPOyYs4L8=; b=sZ0h1SgQ8c3E2u1X+mS4wsCSETe3sOaR2X7Lw/yVRlDfgbXX0IZiZQTNYq/Hvirg7v b2lfMI9oJ4NCNAMHTgJQuGIfhh0g7HkBwugnmgNc1JI/aSq49O7xsiIILpmFoboK0F/0 2r8r30KggZ6rWO+aX8qN0+BluPS4CNf57pIk75R7KMgLuyeGZ9aFeBeWVo2yv9eFvh2y GauLdYeCsF/Wt5ZykZTDJG238DMfHhfcTcf8Puc7+Z87IgAlAYqm1AhPkJp9pezguMEN KUqvGbGF+b3Yfh7qCygjC6/MrbI/FfSmAGLqc/QjtoBWqN2+dRYK++tESX88HPHaZ/mQ 1mDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530kjAstZs5+67irPC7F909Y9SPXwJhi92N7dFcAlTPpQeiysMvw icruYeim6uVZhgZHnvH1emgEdR6mBO566dBm X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxOF8XlCJlkZ7YBY/l6+ars2LO4G3tSAVN0kyOd3qc0P0zZj5KTPnApKxVh+d5ieRji0tdI7Q== X-Received: by 2002:a37:ac12:: with SMTP id e18mr2189112qkm.306.1603736187651; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chatter.i7.local ([89.36.78.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k4sm6946445qkj.46.2020.10.26.11.16.26 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:16:25 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: git-receive-pack doesn't seem to respect gpg.program config Message-ID: <20201026181625.c6f5y44ydndkniul@chatter.i7.local> Mail-Followup-To: git@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi, all: While trying to configure signed pushes, I found out that no mater where I set gpg.program=/opt/gnupg22/bin/gpg (in-repo config, ~/.gitconfig, /etc/gitconfig), git-receive-pack didn't appear to be paying any attention to that setting and always used the "gpg" command in the PATH. Not sure if that's intentional or not, but seems like it should be paying attention at least to /etc/gitconfig. -K