From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FA81F4B4 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 17:28:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730110AbgJMR2k (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 13:28:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35520 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727029AbgJMR2k (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 13:28:40 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD2D9C0613D0 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 10:28:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id w17so897530ilg.8 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 10:28:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ttaylorr-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=LtJFrk1uTWoLaC9UxZSr9tnibIY1x9JAnWWxUpdq1zI=; b=Bw3k/2n3MYCSIxjZrqrg+jKtyqBz7At6ybSyShE0NhQ4Fej+95cTuPacg1ErmEyuv8 XBKxJFo68hkonbCITTs6PDFV732rMhsCoGVb9S11/OW4lMKRYW6LinQK/J7okp36c4LV KE97qr6eUP9Izgwv+gNl83F8akwyh0Z+pCxAPJsusNpPxQEA2nFFw07VKr25ggtQF6gb cJvt5HIRyLekBOJ+U5KdiYidntJdsFw4gVWV6jXRcpyX7vUz3op1dLFLinD8lACgHXbN 3gt264iEOmgO2O3O1Y7q2XZ6ia5A9Bz/gKC4q39jS3juKuk53ZnZ6F8dxBiwQl7PGXMU f26Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=LtJFrk1uTWoLaC9UxZSr9tnibIY1x9JAnWWxUpdq1zI=; b=rr1uzYD6xNDQETRnS2fA/TQB/WTsBRFRdj/IqmL4tKKxFZbZpTwMNlpdPN45+vHkJT mh3cMznbUOd+ElwomQFY2IIXcnTqH4gBVJ+CRP99FINM4Ur6s5JW9aIzilMj77O5AWJn QiJErwh4kc9vNrawIBen4V6usOjkqE1mBAu59gYdi1Bpe9FJ8XLxhmkREzOMzAotwtUK 475dFYoZ5xtLW/WH2A++Nf6Vk3j7fuA43+x1rx3TwQooSSwIIWvZbDUWJiYHFTp7Odwn JuFr3LAW6vmFr+uR+EuZCz+gIir9PkBciYTlDaDHsi6sSAfi8pJBt3QafRMFyD1FMSj6 AiNg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315ID2EwhC6IxXjN731PMy6ZVTEoFd8dwitP1EqRGkqi6+mcX/B JemIh5xg/T2ht0Sq/cUmx+cz2w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwcdjdSoO5ioxX3amWFixAQLRfAQOkDcNPwqUWHpaL7Izxp3nxVcf2AasHQ+xMIKoI9g4MUBw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:962:: with SMTP id q2mr881029ilt.290.1602610118271; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 10:28:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2605:9480:22e:ff10:a4a8:cfa:3aeb:51fa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r4sm492604ilc.32.2020.10.13.10.28.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 10:28:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 13:28:35 -0400 From: Taylor Blau To: Elijah Newren Cc: Taylor Blau , Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] test-lib: allow selecting tests by substring/regex with --run Message-ID: <20201013172835.GA1917721@nand.local> References: <46fce3a844c90b4078578f5aa2058bd6825af1d6.1602545164.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <20201013153901.GA1913367@nand.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:23:32AM -0700, Elijah Newren wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 8:39 AM Taylor Blau wrote: > > This piece of documentation looks to be now out of date; it mentions a > > "test or range of tests", but that only covers a two of the now four > > ways to describe a test. > > Personally, I had read "test or range of tests" as general enough to > cover all the cases (I would have agreed that "test *number* or range > of tests" would sound out of date), and just left it. However, if > there's something clearer, I'm happy to adopt it. Do you have an > alternate wording suggestion? Maybe "test selectors"? You could even say something like "test selectors (e.g., the test number, a range, a substring/regular expression)". I don't know, though; I don't feel strongly about it. Thanks, Taylor