From: "Samuel Čavoj" <samuel@cavoj.net>
To: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sequencer: fix gpg option passed to merge subcommand
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 12:51:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201013105159.rfpczn563agvih5y@fastboi.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2491759-e761-647b-7e76-3515b8eeaf3f@gmail.com>
Hi Phillip,
thank you very much for the feedback.
On 13.10.2020 11:02, Phillip Wood wrote:
> Hi Samuel
>
> On 13/10/2020 00:49, Samuel Čavoj wrote:
> > From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
> >
> > When performing a rebase with --rebase-merges using either a custom
> > strategy specified with -s or an octopus merge, and at the same time
> > having gpgsign enabled (either rebase -S or config commit.gpgsign), the
> > operation would fail on making the merge commit. Instead of "-S%s" with
> > the key id substituted, only the bare key id would get passed to the
> > underlying merge command, which tried to interpret it as a ref.
> >
> > Fix the issue and add a test case as suggested by Johannes Schindelin.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Čavoj <samuel@cavoj.net>
> > ---
> > changed v1 -> v2:
> > added test case
> > ---
> > sequencer.c | 2 +-
> > t/t3435-rebase-gpg-sign.sh | 6 ++++++
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> > index 00acb12496..88ccff4838 100644
> > --- a/sequencer.c
> > +++ b/sequencer.c
> > @@ -3677,7 +3677,7 @@ static int do_merge(struct repository *r,
> > strvec_push(&cmd.args, "-F");
> > strvec_push(&cmd.args, git_path_merge_msg(r));
> > if (opts->gpg_sign)
> > - strvec_push(&cmd.args, opts->gpg_sign);
> > + strvec_pushf(&cmd.args, "-S%s", opts->gpg_sign);
> > /* Add the tips to be merged */
> > for (j = to_merge; j; j = j->next)
> > diff --git a/t/t3435-rebase-gpg-sign.sh b/t/t3435-rebase-gpg-sign.sh
> > index b47c59c190..f70b280f5c 100755
> > --- a/t/t3435-rebase-gpg-sign.sh
> > +++ b/t/t3435-rebase-gpg-sign.sh
> > @@ -68,4 +68,10 @@ test_expect_failure 'rebase -p --no-gpg-sign override commit.gpgsign' '
> > test_must_fail git verify-commit HEAD
> > '
> > +test_expect_success 'rebase -r, GPG and merge strategies' '
> > + git reset --hard merged &&
> > + git rebase -fr --gpg-sign -s resolve --root &&
> > + git verify-commit HEAD
> > +'
>
> Unfortunately I've just noticed that the test above runs
>
> git config commit.gpgsign true
>
> So this test would pass anyway if merge picks up that config setting. The
> previous test needs to be changed to
>
> test_config commit.gpgsign true
Should I do that now, maybe as a separate part of the patch series? Or
just override the config with a `test_config commit.gpgsign false` in
the test I added?
There is another usage of `git config` in the file, in the
test_rebase_gpg_sign function.
>
> so that the config setting is cleared when that test finishes. That previous
> test would then be a good template for testing `rebase -r --no-gpg-sign` if
> you wanted to add a test for that to the next patch as Junio suggested.
Yes, I will definitely do that in v3. Also, the previous test is expect_failure,
that means its a known bug?
Regards,
Samuel
>
> Best Wishes
>
> Phillip
>
> > test_done
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-13 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-12 23:49 [PATCH v2 1/2] sequencer: fix gpg option passed to merge subcommand Samuel Čavoj
2020-10-12 23:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sequencer: pass explicit --no-gpg-sign to merge Samuel Čavoj
2020-10-13 4:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-13 10:03 ` Phillip Wood
2020-10-12 23:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sequencer: fix gpg option passed to merge subcommand Samuel Čavoj
2020-10-13 9:55 ` Phillip Wood
2020-10-13 10:43 ` Samuel Čavoj
2020-10-13 13:15 ` Phillip Wood
2020-10-13 10:02 ` Phillip Wood
2020-10-13 10:51 ` Samuel Čavoj [this message]
2020-10-13 13:28 ` Phillip Wood
2020-10-13 22:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-13 23:45 ` Samuel Čavoj
2020-10-14 15:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-16 13:40 ` Phillip Wood
2020-10-16 16:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-16 17:25 ` Phillip Wood
2020-10-16 20:15 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201013105159.rfpczn563agvih5y@fastboi.localdomain \
--to=samuel@cavoj.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).