From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640761F4B4 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 06:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389584AbgJMGh1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 02:37:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47556 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389470AbgJMGh0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 02:37:26 -0400 Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E937AC0613D0 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 23:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1B413AB0B1; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 06:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 945FA160053; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 06:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866CD16003E; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 06:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id S8nYJUYSn5Eb; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 06:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from larwa.hq.kempniu.pl (unknown [212.180.223.213]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FBD0160090; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 06:37:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 08:37:22 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBLxJlwaWXFhA==?= To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] diff: add -I that ignores matching changes Message-ID: <20201013063722.GC3278@larwa.hq.kempniu.pl> References: <20201001120606.25773-1-michal@isc.org> <20201012091751.19594-1-michal@isc.org> <20201012091751.19594-3-michal@isc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org > > the use of `xcalloc()`, and now that I think further about it, an > > `xmalloc()` should be plenty enough: `regcomp()` does not need that struct > > to be initialized to all zero. > > Yup, I think it makes sense. Sure thing, I will switch to xmalloc() in v3. xcalloc()'s semantics ("allocate one structure of this size") appealed to me, but there is indeed no need to zero-initialize the allocated memory before passing it to regcomp(). -- Best regards, Michał Kępień