From: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] CodingGuidelines: mark external declarations with "extern"
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:00:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201009230033.GA31120@generichostname> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqpn5rrvfg.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio,
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 01:33:39PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
> > The argument for including it is less clear to me. You say below:
> >
> >> [...]By doing so, we would also prevent a
> >> mistake of not writing "extern" when we need to (i.e. decls of data
> >> items, that are not functions) when less experienced developers try
> >> to mimic how the existing surrounding declarations are written.
> >
> > but to my recollection that has not been a big problem. And it's one
> > that's usually easily caught by the compiler. A missing "extern" on a
> > variable will usually get you a multiple-definition warning at
> > link-time (if you manage to also omit the actual definition you won't
> > see that, though "make sparse" will warn that your variable ought to be
> > static).
>
> Not really, that is where the "common" extension comes in, to help
> us with it hurt others without it, unknowingly X-<.
I'm not really sure what you mean by the "common" extension.
> $ cat >a.c <<\EOF
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include "c.h"
>
> int common = 47;
>
> int main(int ac, char **av)
> {
> printf("%d\n", common + other);
> return 0;
> }
> EOF
> $ cat >b.c <<\EOF
> #include "c.h"
>
> int other = 22;
> EOF
> $ cat >c.h <<\EOF
> int common;
> int other;
> EOF
> $ gcc -Wall -o c a.c b.c; ./c
> 59
On gcc 10.2.0, it errors out successfully. Although on clang 10.0.1, it
compiles successfully and produces "69". That being said, I think extern
variables are relatively rare in our codebase and, when it happens, they
usually come as part of lists of other extern variables so a developer
who's mimicking the surrounding code would be able to copy it
successfully. Otherwise, the decl usually pops out in header files as it
is quite unusual.
> And I have a strong preference, after thinking about it, to have
> "extern" in front in the declarations. It gives another clue for
> patterns I feed to "git grep" to latch onto, and help my eyes to
> scan and tell decls and defns apart in the output. The benefit
> alone is worth the extra 7 columns in front spent, which you call
> "clutter".
To be honest, I do not have any preference between having the explicit
extern or not. I do have a strong preference, however, for having a
codebase that's consistently written. When I was doing the refactor, I
wouldn't have minded introducing extern everywhere although that wasn't
suggested as an alternative.
I agree that these are all benefits of declaring functions explicitly as
extern. However, I don't think they're worth the cost of either another
huge rewrite or an inconsistent codebase.
> > IMHO the real problem here is that C's syntax for returning a function
> > pointer is so horrendous. How about this (on top of your earlier patch
> > to drop the extern from that declaration)?
>
> In general, I like a typedef for callback function that shortens the
> decl of a function that takes such a callback, so I think
>
> > +void set_error_routine(report_fn routine);
> > +void set_warn_routine(report_fn routine);
> > +report_fn get_error_routine(void);
> > +report_fn get_warn_routine(void);
>
> these are good, but they are better with "extern" in front in a
> header file to make it clear they are declarations and not
> definitions when they appear in "git grep" output.
I agree that this looks a lot better, with or without the extern.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-09 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-08 15:27 [PATCH] clean up extern decl of functions Junio C Hamano
2020-10-09 1:55 ` Denton Liu
2020-10-09 2:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-09 19:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-09 19:27 ` [RFC] CodingGuidelines: mark external declarations with "extern" Junio C Hamano
2020-10-09 19:57 ` Jeff King
2020-10-09 20:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-09 23:00 ` Denton Liu [this message]
2020-10-09 23:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-10 0:37 ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-10-15 1:36 ` Jeff King
2020-10-15 17:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-15 19:28 ` Jeff King
2020-10-15 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] usage: define a type for a reporting function Jeff King
2020-10-15 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] config.mak.dev: build with -fno-common Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201009230033.GA31120@generichostname \
--to=liu.denton@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).