Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] hideTimezone: add a user.hideTimezone config

[Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>]

Hi,

Shengfa Lin wrote:
> Thanks for the comments.

>>> +user.hideTimezone::
>>> +  Override TZ to UTC for Git commits to hide user's timezone in commit
>>> +  date
>>
>> One level of indentation in this codebase is a single HT.
>>
>> Unterminated sentence.
>
> What does HT stands for? I will change the indentation to 8 spaces.

HT means "horizontal tab", like might be shown with "man ascii".

Git uses tabs for indentation.  This file is documentation instead of
source so clang-format doesn't know about it, but I might as well
mention anyway: if you run "make style", then clang-format will give
some suggestions around formatting.  The configuration for that is not
yet perfect so you can take its suggestions with a grain of salt, but
they should get you in the right direction.

[...]
>>> --- a/builtin/commit.c
>>> +++ b/builtin/commit.c
>>> @@ -1569,6 +1569,11 @@ int cmd_commit(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>>>  	status_format = STATUS_FORMAT_NONE; /* Ignore status.short */
>>>  	s.colopts = 0;
>>>  
>>> +  git_config(git_default_config, NULL);
>>
>> Declaration after statement is not tolerated in this codebase.
>
> If I use the DEVELOPER=1 flag in config.mak and call make again, would the compiler
> catches this as an error?

Yes, DEVELOPER_CFLAGS includes -Wdeclaration-after-statement.

>>> +  int hide_timezone = 0;
>>
>> Unnecessary initialization.
>>
>>> +  if (!git_config_get_bool("user.hideTimezone", &hide_timezone)  && hide_timezone)
>
> Is it unnecessary because I am checking the return value from git_config_get_bool so
> that the uninitialized value won't be used?

By leaving it uninitialized, you can help avoid the reader wondering
whether there is some code path where the default value is used.

[...]
>>             Instead, make sure it is set to some timestamp in some
>> timezone that is not UTC, and the timezone of the resulting commit
>> author date is in that timezone.  But that must have already been
>> done in basic tests on "git commit" that we honor the environment
>> variable, no?  Which means there is no need to add yet another extra
>> baseline test here.
>
> I am not sure if this test has already been done in commit basic tests.
> Will remove this test.

Let's see: *checks with "git grep -e TZ -- t"*.

Looks like t0006 tests various aspects of TZ handling pretty well and
t1100 includes of test using TZ with commit-tree (good).

Thanks and hope that helps,
Jonathan