From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Bryan Turner <bturner@atlassian.com>, Git Users <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Mismatched HEAD default behavior from git log
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:46:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200825194619.GB1419759@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq8se21pl1.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:40:42PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Bryan Turner <bturner@atlassian.com> writes:
>
> > It appears the way --stdin processes input discards nonexistent
> > commits before the machinery that decides whether you provided any
> > revs or not runs, and so if every --stdin rev is discarded then you
> > get the default HEAD. If you provide them via the command line,
> > though, then it seems like they're discarded later and you don't get a
> > default.
> >
> > I'm not sure whether this is intentional or not (certainly I don't see
> > it anywhere in the git log documentation for --ignore-missing or
> > --stdin), but it results in a behavior mismatch that's impossible to
> > reconcile without requiring extra git processes. I can't always
> > provide HEAD since, if multiple revs are supplied, if any revs exist
> > then HEAD would not be included regardless of whether the revs were
> > supplied via the command line or --stdin.
>
> As the intent for adding the "--stdin" option to any subcommand has
> always been "we may need to feed many many things, that may bust the
> command line length limit, hence we let you feed these things from
> the standard input, but otherwise there should be no change in
> behaviour or semantics", when the behaviour of command line and
> "--stdin" differ, it is a bug in the latter.
Agreed. It also helps in this case that the command-line behavior is
sensible and the --stdin one is not. :)
I think the solution is probably something like:
diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
index 96630e3186..f5bbefa091 100644
--- a/revision.c
+++ b/revision.c
@@ -2099,12 +2099,13 @@ static void read_pathspec_from_stdin(struct strbuf *sb,
strvec_push(prune, sb->buf);
}
-static void read_revisions_from_stdin(struct rev_info *revs,
- struct strvec *prune)
+static int read_revisions_from_stdin(struct rev_info *revs,
+ struct strvec *prune)
{
struct strbuf sb;
int seen_dashdash = 0;
int save_warning;
+ int got_rev_arg = 0;
save_warning = warn_on_object_refname_ambiguity;
warn_on_object_refname_ambiguity = 0;
@@ -2124,12 +2125,14 @@ static void read_revisions_from_stdin(struct rev_info *revs,
if (handle_revision_arg(sb.buf, revs, 0,
REVARG_CANNOT_BE_FILENAME))
die("bad revision '%s'", sb.buf);
+ got_rev_arg = 1;
}
if (seen_dashdash)
read_pathspec_from_stdin(&sb, prune);
strbuf_release(&sb);
warn_on_object_refname_ambiguity = save_warning;
+ return got_rev_arg;
}
static void add_grep(struct rev_info *revs, const char *ptn, enum grep_pat_token what)
@@ -2754,7 +2757,8 @@ int setup_revisions(int argc, const char **argv, struct rev_info *revs, struct s
}
if (revs->read_from_stdin++)
die("--stdin given twice?");
- read_revisions_from_stdin(revs, &prune_data);
+ if (read_revisions_from_stdin(revs, &prune_data))
+ got_rev_arg = 1;
continue;
}
Possibly it would make sense to push that flag into rev_info, though,
and let handle_revision_arg() set it. That would fix this bug and
prevent similar ones in other code paths (though we're not likely to get
revisions from anywhere else, I suppose).
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-25 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-25 19:16 Mismatched HEAD default behavior from git log Bryan Turner
2020-08-25 19:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-25 19:46 ` Jeff King [this message]
2020-08-25 19:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-25 19:55 ` Jeff King
2020-08-26 20:13 ` [PATCH] revision: set rev_input_given in handle_revision_arg() Jeff King
2020-08-26 20:20 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200825194619.GB1419759@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=bturner@atlassian.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).