From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9A11F66E for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 19:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726391AbgHYTmS (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:42:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54046 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726149AbgHYTmQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:42:16 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1032.google.com (mail-pj1-x1032.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68CF7C061574 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id kx11so17889pjb.5 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:42:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ZRq5TqL7kIjLAu+WnVw10wLkzWqKyOjbs9r+KAX1EXU=; b=BZ3SL98a+QBR4HIwKAzVR3f7UQVYJCRSpxI23OS0XkkoJrk19HC4oDhB5bJnkNP89i rRMa6eOBEhJUxZWoOZ2IboyFGsD7mtq4CyEiUjbZ5C41M0mcwKamXdpZRcvRiNOVWFHj Qlofeisj2f05XP7j3J7iRmleCJ+QVNY7Ue3zgZeiGwFeh4LSzI+yopr1z9lBbuilOSiE bAt1U3fxhg5YrAXakBlbQb/0FMIJuuFpMR84jqaFSTSrFEquP7FJZnwDHJP96zriO36N 9jfCdbyrUDfxQ17dh+Zw1j/iD1wqWQRFzjPEUedrKPGVJ9TRGO/6Acizt0ZiskZxTwsL 1z+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ZRq5TqL7kIjLAu+WnVw10wLkzWqKyOjbs9r+KAX1EXU=; b=RpTPkd1k9bPxINyWEPAWHkoAh9eq/6iz86qzetUtI8Aa5HOavZKHSY/K1IWyI7xcvB 1AZyJ47R0OddouZF1d9C+lhSxF8kmwFkXxGg9orGAKiR+5Wogv1oNZ4wioEqLcEU0uov mRnw5mn3fgMIPjuGBGOPciIGDAn7nvkJWs2mh0IFf8lBj669AM57JzjqxgqBquBYVfi8 oX/FX2aE0rzCGjkVutL8NbN5lVQDeVMAHFK8YtnQszgDQYdUYRJCmMjiMwZR52C8mTui ffSouBqn3QXo3PblB6tdwxbb2PFWhjlbFpNWPmNT5iH6gyZbEYW2pm93vfwKhqqd28NP y1SA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Dm7E7mHJM2NJp9/eX+CHO7Ad1ZtrSYnej0kE5TMYgF04AADZU P78r9gHbW45julyGa8oFxZOu3A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx1tNLgaRIjEM14jbQdnO0ha401dyut1ZTbMYsILl3+llb4nZ2AXdR0qyIYoYtpfvZkPyQPgA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4382:: with SMTP id r2mr888829pjg.144.1598384535351; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:2ce:0:1ea0:b8ff:fe77:f690]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t19sm20725pfq.179.2020.08.25.12.42.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:42:09 -0700 From: Emily Shaffer To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2020, #06; Mon, 24) Message-ID: <20200825194209.GB331156@google.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org > * es/config-hooks (2020-07-30) 6 commits > - hook: add 'run' subcommand > - parse-options: parse into argv_array > - hook: add --porcelain to list command > - hook: add list command > - hook: scaffolding for git-hook subcommand > - doc: propose hooks managed by the config > > The "hooks defined in config" topic. > > Expecting a reroll. > Now jk/strvec is in 'master', we may want to see the topic reworked > on top of it. Are there unresolved issues, or does the topic need > a round of detailed review? I have it reworked locally to use strvec instead. I see in https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqsgd8606c.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com that you were waiting for another jk/strvec reroll and it looks like that's happened now, so I'll rebase this series against 'master' once more. I'm ready for the first four (five?) of the series to receive a detailed review, but I think it's premature for the 6th to be considered before I've seen what the conversion process looks like for existing hook callers. That's my main focus right now, although it tends to be bumped by concerns for the summit next month as well as pesky life events. - Emily