git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>, Nuthan Munaiah <nm6061@rit.edu>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] blame: fix bug in coalescing non-adjacent "-L" chunks
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 01:20:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200813052054.GA1962792@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200807223522.GB3750245@coredump.intra.peff.net>

On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 06:35:22PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> > > I think the only conceivable case is that in the middle of a single
> > > block of text in an ancient version, another block of lines gets
> > > inserted during the evolution of the file, but in the end these
> > > intermediate edits all go away and the same original text remains.
> > > 
> > > In such a case, without coalescing, we would not treat the original
> > > single block of text as a single unit.
> > 
> > Yeah, that makes sense, and it should be possible to construct a case
> > based on that.

I started to add a test for this, and it turns out we already had one!
It just wasn't checking the output as carefully as it could. :)

So here's a series which actually checks that blame_coalesce() is doing
something useful, and then fixes Nuthan's bug on top (with a test case,
but I also confirmed it makes the original tomcat issue go away).

  [1/3]: t8003: check output of coalesced blame
  [2/3]: t8003: factor setup out of coalesce test
  [3/3]: blame: only coalesce lines that are adjacent in result

 blame.c                       |  1 +
 t/t8003-blame-corner-cases.sh | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-13  5:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-07  1:05 `git blame` Line Number Off-by-one Nuthan Munaiah
2020-08-07 21:21 ` Jeff King
2020-08-07 21:33   ` Jeff King
2020-08-07 21:45     ` Jeff King
2020-08-07 22:05     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-07 22:26       ` Jeff King
2020-08-07 22:35         ` Jeff King
2020-08-13  5:20           ` Jeff King [this message]
2020-08-13  5:23             ` [PATCH 1/3] t8003: check output of coalesced blame Jeff King
2020-08-13 17:04               ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-13 17:22                 ` Jeff King
2020-08-13  5:23             ` [PATCH 2/3] t8003: factor setup out of coalesce test Jeff King
2020-08-13  5:25             ` [PATCH 3/3] blame: only coalesce lines that are adjacent in result Jeff King
2020-08-13 16:59               ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-13 18:41               ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-13 12:25             ` [PATCH 0/3] blame: fix bug in coalescing non-adjacent "-L" chunks Barret Rhoden

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200813052054.GA1962792@coredump.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=brho@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=nm6061@rit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).