git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Emma Brooks <me@pluvano.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Jakub Narębski" <jnareb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gitweb: map names/emails with mailmap
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:55:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200811045509.GA81227@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200811041728.GA1748@pluvano.com>

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:17:28AM +0000, Emma Brooks wrote:

> On 2020-08-10 06:02:49-0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > There was a little discussion in response to v1 on whether we could
> > reuse the existing C mailmap code:
> > 
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200731010129.GD240563@coredump.intra.peff.net/
> > 
> > Did you have any thoughts on that?
> 
> I think it's probably not worth the effort to make the necessary changes
> to "rev-list --header" Junio mentioned, just for gitweb.

Yeah, I agree that probably doesn't make sense to change "rev-list
--header". I wonder if git could be using "rev-list --format" instead,
though, and asking for the specific things it wants. That could improve
more than just this case, too (e.g., the C code would be parsing and
normalizing author/committer idents, which could make handling of badly
formatted ones more consistent with other Git tools).

It may be a big change, though. I don't know the gitweb code very well.

> I agree it's a bit worrisome to have a second parser that could
> potentially behave slightly differently than the main implementation.
> What if we added tests for gitweb's mailmap parsing based on the same
> cases used for Git itself?

That would certainly help, though I don't know how easy it would be to
replicate all of the tests in a maintainable way.

-Peff

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-11  4:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-30  4:12 [RFC PATCH] gitweb: Map names/emails with mailmap Emma Brooks
2020-07-30 16:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-31  1:01 ` Jeff King
2020-07-31  2:10   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-08 21:34 ` [PATCH] " Emma Brooks
2020-08-09 23:04   ` [PATCH v2] gitweb: map " Emma Brooks
2020-08-10  0:49     ` Eric Sunshine
2020-08-10  3:12       ` Emma Brooks
2020-08-10  5:41         ` Eric Sunshine
2020-08-10 10:02     ` Jeff King
2020-08-11  4:17       ` Emma Brooks
2020-08-11  4:48         ` Eric Sunshine
2020-08-11  4:55         ` Jeff King [this message]
2020-09-05  2:55           ` Emma Brooks
2020-09-05  3:26             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-09-07 22:10               ` Emma Brooks
2020-08-11  6:17         ` Eric Wong
2020-08-11  6:33           ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200811045509.GA81227@coredump.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=me@pluvano.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).