From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] t6300: fix issues related to %(contents:size)
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:47:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200731174709.GD843002@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200731174509.9199-1-alban.gruin@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 07:45:09PM +0200, Alban Gruin wrote:
> b6839fda68 (ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size), 2020-07-16)
> added a new format for ref-filter, and added a function to generate
> tests for this new feature in t6300. Unfortunately, it tries to run
> `test_expect_sucess' instead of `test_expect_success', and writes
> $expect to `expected', but tries to read `expect'. Those two issues
> were probably unnoticed because the script only printed errors, but did
> not crash. This fixes these issues.
Oh, this just crossed with my mail. :)
Definitely fixes the issue, though I wonder:
> - echo $expect >expected
> - test_expect_${4:-sucess} $PREREQ "basic atom: $1 contents:size" '
> + echo $expect >expect
> + test_expect_${4:-success} $PREREQ "basic atom: $1 contents:size" '
> git for-each-ref --format="%(contents:size)" "$ref" >actual &&
> test_cmp expect actual
> '
Should we instead switch the test_cmp to look at "expected" to be
consistent with the rest of the tests in this file?
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-31 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-07 17:40 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add support for %(contents:size) in ref-filter Christian Couder
2020-07-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Documentation: clarify %(contents:XXXX) doc Christian Couder
2020-07-07 19:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-10 16:47 ` Christian Couder
2020-07-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Documentation: clarify 'complete message' Christian Couder
2020-07-07 19:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] t6300: test refs pointing to tree and blob Christian Couder
2020-07-07 19:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size) Christian Couder
2020-07-07 19:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-09 0:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-09 8:10 ` Christian Couder
2020-07-09 13:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-07 22:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-08 23:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for %(contents:size) in ref-filter Christian Couder
2020-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] Documentation: clarify %(contents:XXXX) doc Christian Couder
2020-07-10 20:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] t6300: test refs pointing to tree and blob Christian Couder
2020-07-10 20:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size) Christian Couder
2020-07-10 20:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-16 12:19 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for %(contents:size) in ref-filter Christian Couder
2020-07-16 12:19 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] Documentation: clarify %(contents:XXXX) doc Christian Couder
2020-07-16 12:19 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] t6300: test refs pointing to tree and blob Christian Couder
2020-07-16 12:19 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size) Christian Couder
2020-07-31 17:37 ` Alban Gruin
2020-07-31 17:45 ` [PATCH v1] t6300: fix issues related to %(contents:size) Alban Gruin
2020-07-31 17:47 ` Jeff King [this message]
2020-07-31 18:24 ` Alban Gruin
2020-07-31 20:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-31 20:30 ` Jeff King
2020-07-31 18:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Alban Gruin
2020-07-31 19:15 ` Jeff King
2020-07-31 17:45 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size) Jeff King
2020-07-31 20:12 ` Christian Couder
2020-07-31 20:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-31 20:40 ` Jeff King
2020-07-16 17:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for %(contents:size) in ref-filter Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200731174709.GD843002@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=alban.gruin@gmail.com \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).