From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533321F5AE for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728258AbgG3AbI (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:31:08 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:42148 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727858AbgG3AbI (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:31:08 -0400 Received: (qmail 10860 invoked by uid 109); 30 Jul 2020 00:31:08 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:31:08 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 13190 invoked by uid 111); 30 Jul 2020 00:31:07 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:31:07 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:31:07 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Linus Torvalds , Johannes Schindelin , Git List Mailing Subject: Re: Avoiding 'master' nomenclature Message-ID: <20200730003107.GC2996059@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20200729205846.GA2992025@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200730001442.GA2996059@coredump.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200730001442.GA2996059@coredump.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 08:14:42PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > I think this will be matching branch names, not fully qualified refs. > Seems reasonable, but we should be sure to document that. Also, I guess it would see "HEAD" when we're on a detached HEAD. That's slightly ambiguous to match, in that you _could_ have refs/heads/HEAD, but we try to make that hard to do. So it's probably not worth worrying about. -Peff