From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA35C1F5AE for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 19:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725807AbgFZT30 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 15:29:26 -0400 Received: from mx0a-00010702.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.75]:46304 "EHLO mx0b-00010702.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725768AbgFZT3Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 15:29:25 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 3082 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 15:29:25 EDT Received: from pps.filterd (m0098780.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00010702.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05QIZejR023551; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:37:55 -0500 Received: from ni.com (skprod3.natinst.com [130.164.80.24]) by mx0a-00010702.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31uusm8kmp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:37:55 -0500 Received: from us-aus-exhub1.ni.corp.natinst.com (us-aus-exhub1.ni.corp.natinst.com [130.164.68.41]) by us-aus-skprod3.natinst.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with ESMTPS id 05QIbsJA029824 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:37:54 -0500 Received: from us-aus-exhub2.ni.corp.natinst.com (130.164.68.32) by us-aus-exhub1.ni.corp.natinst.com (130.164.68.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:37:54 -0500 Received: from USAUSLT-XB7F4SC.ni.corp.natinst.com (172.18.68.32) by us-aus-exhub2.ni.corp.natinst.com (130.164.68.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:37:54 -0500 From: Neil Stoddard To: CC: , , , Subject: Re: Rename offensive terminology (master) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:37:53 -0500 Message-ID: <20200626183753.52288-1-neil.stoddard@ni.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0.vfs.0.0 In-Reply-To: <'CAOAHyQyn_ow7_nCJ+Jorr76_=1=_kuBAD1KhqReqVfRQQbmgiw@mail.gmail.com'> References: <'CAOAHyQyn_ow7_nCJ+Jorr76_=1=_kuBAD1KhqReqVfRQQbmgiw@mail.gmail.com'> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216,18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-26_10:2020-06-26,2020-06-26 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: orgsafe Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Would it be possible to get a summary of the current state of the discussion? In addition to the ongoing patchset to enable setting a different default initial branch name: 1) Are the git maintainers still considering renaming the initial default branch to something else? 2) If yes, is there consensus among the maintainers on the name 'main'? 3) If yes, how will this change be rolled out? Will the change be delayed to align with a breaking release? 4) Are the maintainers waiting for more discussion or input from the community? Are there voices you feel are yet to be heard?