From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1BA1F55B for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 23:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388047AbgEWXFb (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 May 2020 19:05:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46762 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388010AbgEWXFb (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 May 2020 19:05:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42f.google.com (mail-pf1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B47C4C061A0E for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 16:05:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id b190so6919168pfg.6 for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 16:05:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ToDnEe0PvDL7y5vjjI1bBeUj79faSN4akz50pZJUQBI=; b=G321YVzy2PIyC+ATAGz4erklc07OObeGCw5Gbz/BnH2ZYT/s0qIi+4vbmu4/Y/suUF uJ9qX3KRqfhU9tyQzvl9zA9yodccshZC+hswH/HcEouWxl45wd+SEFDEGXEuxXEfPPWG avqZfMSBEdoW3y1f+5K9G/dIwt4TKO5FWiAv/5gt3ux3FkzHBhggx1XMeKdo7JsVDc55 hXHRj7fSWDJyAn8s58XKRwzx5d0sTe+Ci1ZrRmNe1fuwRsatUOIR03lE0GXxWzJkuXE7 w3wY222dQSRJZTVtp+FGg8LsKn6DWBL5r6gtp3U/7l1zWtyu2D9SONfhhs5y1dySoLb0 K9aA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ToDnEe0PvDL7y5vjjI1bBeUj79faSN4akz50pZJUQBI=; b=VMyNq9u1VZzCL1UxBC2j6wqak8BB+jlfJYKnR3sfBO95/BtUa2sBu2H/OGBiviNBvn RI8ABJjwEeqNHSNIUbgIUk9RTfm3FStIRsnTTDqRaK4FFII1fMwJsiHbVbCIZejGhBJU UlFSf/5jH5c1JZtumsN5OLH8UsOI4hsGkGl8OOsLSczKhRO8Ilnr/aLvN59OyCP7XiyB tEnB5oeWH+Y1SukbaiDTzzg9zy3SE1VEVzFaeSFFQtsYduGZi1RPVkXSL0z11yPJ02XG Djbt+hyAyeonCK8o+uQ5+D81WQZZV6Nl29xFhD15gfqYh4cOAwx+lyFiDKUoZTUIchX+ Q2Hw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Mf6Ve7X0je1e3Ujb7SK3ga9VH0Qffm9f98RvhVBDW+rA19Wpk lK0eBoY5W5uyziOq5Gf0Xhs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxxqdpSnUphpstIPE4pxjbKdGXu0d5BV939q6X9EUIti6XCt01qXAJLpjjEy/E8f2y6s7PLzQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9e52:: with SMTP id z18mr10410624pfq.57.1590275129073; Sat, 23 May 2020 16:05:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2402:800:6374:cd6f:3908:64aa:a24d:1be1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m3sm9140854pjs.17.2020.05.23.16.05.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 23 May 2020 16:05:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 06:05:26 +0700 From: =?utf-8?B?xJBvw6BuIFRy4bqnbiBDw7RuZw==?= Danh To: phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Junio C Hamano , Elijah Newren , Rohit Ashiwal , Alban Gruin , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] rebase -i: support --ignore-date Message-ID: <20200523230526.GA1981@danh.dev> References: <20200407141125.30872-1-phillip.wood123@gmail.com> <20200521101455.63484-1-phillip.wood123@gmail.com> <20200521101455.63484-5-phillip.wood123@gmail.com> <20200523123025.GA20683@danh.dev> <20200523155203.GA10163@danh.dev> <0cf07e92-25f2-ae0f-6f44-c2cd9e9f4851@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0cf07e92-25f2-ae0f-6f44-c2cd9e9f4851@gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi Phillip, On 2020-05-23 19:50:40+0100, Phillip Wood wrote: > > The part of my reply you've cut said "I've checked the log invocations in > the other tests and I think they're all OK." So it is just the one that you > pointed out that needs to be fixed up (the others without -1 are all > checking the result of rebase --root). I'm happy to re-roll if Junio wants - > lets wait and see what he says. Ah, I was thinking "they're all OK" meant that part can be left as-is, and the only part need to change is the --pretty=format. Sorry for the noise, (and my bad in reading). -- Danh