From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1301F55B for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:24:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728364AbgETVYq (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2020 17:24:46 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:52484 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728174AbgETVYq (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2020 17:24:46 -0400 Received: (qmail 9035 invoked by uid 109); 20 May 2020 21:24:45 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:24:45 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 18461 invoked by uid 111); 20 May 2020 21:24:46 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 20 May 2020 17:24:46 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 17:24:44 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel , git-packagers@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Re* [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.27.0-rc1 Message-ID: <20200520212444.GA590699@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20200520193156.GA4700@coredump.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 01:31:30PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > The promotion in Git 2.26 was buried in the "performance & > implementation details" section and not in the backward > compatibility section, so it feels a bit funny to highlight the > reversion. In any case, here is what I prepared (but not committed > yet) Hmm, yeah, that does make it feel funny. I'd argue that it probably would have been worth promoting a bit more in v2.26, but it is obviously too late now. > -- >8 -- > Subject: [PATCH] RelNotes: advertise the demotion of protocol v2 What you have here looks fine, but I'd be OK if we just left it as-is, too, given the v2.26 mention. -Peff