From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,
	SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844501F55B
	for <e@yhbt.net>; Wed, 20 May 2020 10:05:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726791AbgETKFc (ORCPT <rfc822;e@yhbt.net>);
        Wed, 20 May 2020 06:05:32 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57356 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726403AbgETKFb (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 20 May 2020 06:05:31 -0400
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de
Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254])
        by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC26AC40;
        Wed, 20 May 2020 10:05:33 +0000 (UTC)
Date:   Wed, 20 May 2020 12:05:28 +0200
From:   Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Such=E1nek?= <msuchanek@suse.de>
To:     Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
        Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fetching 24 Linux commits = 1.2 GiB
Message-ID: <20200520100528.GV25173@kitsune.suse.cz>
References: <b7f5bfb9-61fb-2552-4399-b744428728e4@suse.cz>
 <20200415135627.vx75hsphbpmgrquv@chatter.i7.local>
 <xmqq1roo947y.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
 <87sgfvq967.fsf@igel.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87sgfvq967.fsf@igel.home>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:53:36AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Apr 15 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > Do these (and I think we saw other reports) make us rethink the
> > status of protocol v2 as the default?  Are all of these fallouts 
> > we saw so far easy-to-fix bugs, or are there more fundamental issues
> > in the v2 protocol design?
> 
> I'm now seeing the issue myself, and can provide a backup of the
> offending repository.
What git version? Should be fixed in git 2.26.2 in SUSE and git 2.26.3
upstream.

Thanks

Michal