From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177911F9E0 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 01:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728214AbgDXBJ1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 21:09:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59224 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725993AbgDXBJ1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 21:09:27 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1043.google.com (mail-pj1-x1043.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1043]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3A5FC09B042 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 18:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1043.google.com with SMTP id t9so3283551pjw.0 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 18:09:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=YO30+55lx7XbfocjkK/8Rbv97lZRpoYNUqFMhxpr16E=; b=UptNbmKsR+cJykHYwX/ms/ykCdRrg89pvjtvvbr9qK0jVgqIqWhAEuQmRkDYXHEo/X vC9YrJZSGBKZy7k/qitzpLadXUFkBi+nj4p6vBeSxqGTqsCLQ84mQAIcaddyS0Y62f/U fyeWoxUj59j5ywRZe1qzpk2SXtZATDv1CbvO0F7CnQ4rhVJa1xSSnuuKWOL+4XuaKI5I +bZjUrabmn1Dlg7V3DqleZcK2/rdMH2NGlMPsOQewoSRMY7YbtCWjWYsYEoYROpGVTIJ yORMCJJ2+gEZ10s1GKc7gTJVzRlSkxpFz9CjrAqwuWsC4mfESuCoRM0n6PQnoTc0MV9r /swA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=YO30+55lx7XbfocjkK/8Rbv97lZRpoYNUqFMhxpr16E=; b=Zlb6zapL+S4sijdgYFFqbAn/O0S43d1KLFYwaz20p/PmsrqiIgtLUIiONL49zIxdr4 EGccXYQmnV5kCY4jDKm0tGUjKcLmQLmeOMC9THV9FmC3FG5E1PhoRtF4J5Udl5gXRkRH BD1TNX720W7rZxKC1G/vAcEnjvBVBmpsOmPkQwt5D8ADp1mfydlC1jWfh0cVOjMUXXxa CGuyXtIdahbdelOBcf1FnBKvxGKpwBsPNTp3UxQz1a0eCkLIz6ui8QBixrY+8cmNjGav uXjaeqR8wGzt4k+ezYNLK+0NcyDgGPiysyR7yyMbaWjJYtiJpI9+lSStzZCONRIWj2qJ 2Wng== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubKSxiQI9hXNYUU94pbOWUnZGaRPSTKRBekvZsebv4lU4YvJp18 93lYayfVKyvd1LYtTWMwRiQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLnQkmP7vAfeTpP4ZEd1767an63RvSTPKSk7uaUAkBVzMCRHGGi35G1f74rrYHL+KqbfRyiBw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:aa44:: with SMTP id c4mr6391027plr.302.1587690566324; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 18:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2402:800:6374:f359:1ce8:a621:5f80:1116]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w186sm4038641pff.83.2020.04.23.18.09.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 23 Apr 2020 18:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:09:24 +0700 From: Danh Doan To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Ramsay Jones , git@vger.kernel.org, Luc Van Oostenryck , Johannes Schindelin , Han-Wen Nienhuys Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] C: s/0/NULL/ for pointer type Message-ID: <20200424010924.GF1949@danh.dev> References: <1df91aa4-dda5-64da-6ae3-5d65e50a55c5@ramsayjones.plus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 2020-04-23 17:54:30-0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Ramsay Jones writes: > > > Actually, I have a patch somewhere which suppressed the sparse warning > > for the '= { 0 }' token sequence used in these initializations. However, > > I don't seem to be able to find them at the moment! :( > > AHHHHHhhhhhhhh. > > Thanks for reminding. Yeah, I recall that the concensus of those > who were vocal in that old discussion [*1*] was that "= { 0 }" > should be taken as an idiom and should not be subject to s/0/NULL/ > conversion. So, to follow that idiom, this patch should be changed, too? https://lore.kernel.org/git/nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2004101604210.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet/ +Cc: Dscho and Han-Wen > > [Luc, this topic came up on the sparse and kernel mailing-lists at one > > point, but I didn't get around to posting my patch to the list - something > > came up. Hopefully, I will find some time to find it and post it soon.] > > > [References] > > *1* > > https://lore.kernel.org/git/e6796c60-a870-e761-3b07-b680f934c537@ramsayjones.plus.com/ -- Danh