From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] credential: treat "?" and "#" in URLs as end of host
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:13:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200415001337.GA7457@syl.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414214304.GA1887601@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Hi Peff,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 05:43:04PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> It's unusual to see:
>
> https://example.com?query-parameters
>
> without an intervening slash, like:
>
> https://example.com/some-path?query-parameters
>
> or even:
>
> https://example.com/?query-parameters
>
> but it is a valid end to the hostname (actually "authority component")
> according to RFC 3986. Likewise for "#".
>
> And curl will parse the URL according to the standard, meaning it will
> contact example.com, but our credential code would ask about a bogus
> hostname with a "?" in it. Let's make sure we follow the standard, and
> more importantly ask about the same hosts that curl will be talking to.
>
> It would be nice if we could just ask curl to parse the URL for us. But
> it didn't grow a URL-parsing API until 7.62, so we'd be stuck with
> fallback code either way. Plus we'd need this code in the main Git
> binary, where we've tried to avoid having a link dependency on libcurl.
>
> But let's at least fix our parser. Moving to curl's parser would prevent
> other potential discrepancies, but this gives us immediate relief for
> the known problem, and would help our fallback code if we eventually use
> curl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
All makes sense to me. I agree that it would probably be preferable if
we could just use cURL's own parser and forget about this code entirely.
But, having it still be a fallback knocks out any benefit that we'd be
getting by relying on their parser rather than our own.
> ---
> Just a follow-on to today's release. This isn't security critical after
> the earlier fix, but it made some of the attack vectors much easier.
Yep, thanks for noting.
> credential.c | 9 ++++++++-
> t/t0300-credentials.sh | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/credential.c b/credential.c
> index 21b3ba152f..8aa9777548 100644
> --- a/credential.c
> +++ b/credential.c
> @@ -388,7 +388,14 @@ int credential_from_url_gently(struct credential *c, const char *url,
> cp = proto_end + 3;
> at = strchr(cp, '@');
> colon = strchr(cp, ':');
> - slash = strchrnul(cp, '/');
> +
> + /*
> + * A query or fragment marker before the slash ends the host portion.
> + * We'll just continue to call this "slash" for simplicity. Notably our
> + * "trim leading slashes" part won't skip over this part of the path,
> + * but that's what we'd want.
> + */
> + slash = cp + strcspn(cp, "/?#");
>
> if (!at || slash <= at) {
> /* Case (1) */
> diff --git a/t/t0300-credentials.sh b/t/t0300-credentials.sh
> index 5b78ebbc3f..b6ec676989 100755
> --- a/t/t0300-credentials.sh
> +++ b/t/t0300-credentials.sh
> @@ -443,11 +443,45 @@ test_expect_success 'url parser ignores embedded newlines' '
> username=askpass-username
> password=askpass-password
> --
> - warning: url contains a newline in its host component: https://one.example.com?%0ahost=two.example.com/
> + warning: url contains a newline in its path component: https://one.example.com?%0ahost=two.example.com/
> warning: skipping credential lookup for url: https://one.example.com?%0ahost=two.example.com/
> askpass: Username:
> askpass: Password:
> EOF
> '
>
> +# usage: check_host_and_path <url> <expected-host> <expected-path>
> +check_host_and_path () {
> + # we always parse the path component, but we need this to make sure it
> + # is passed to the helper
> + test_config credential.useHTTPPath true &&
> + check fill "verbatim user pass" <<-EOF
> + url=$1
> + --
> + protocol=https
> + host=$2
> + path=$3
> + username=user
> + password=pass
> + --
> + verbatim: get
> + verbatim: protocol=https
> + verbatim: host=$2
> + verbatim: path=$3
> + EOF
> +}
> +
> +test_expect_success 'url parser handles bare query marker' '
> + check_host_and_path https://example.com?foo.git example.com ?foo.git
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'url parser handles bare fragment marker' '
> + check_host_and_path https://example.com#foo.git example.com "#foo.git"
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'url parser not confused by encoded markers' '
> + check_host_and_path https://example.com%23%3f%2f/foo.git \
> + "example.com#?/" foo.git
> +'
> +
> test_done
These look good, too. Thanks for working on this.
> --
> 2.26.1.429.g609150846d
Thanks,
Taylor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-15 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-14 21:43 [PATCH] credential: treat "?" and "#" in URLs as end of host Jeff King
2020-04-15 0:13 ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2020-04-15 18:39 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200415001337.GA7457@syl.local \
--to=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).