From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>,
Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>,
Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, me@ttaylorr.com,
Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>,
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] revision: --include-diversions adds helpful merges
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 15:21:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200409192149.GA4168991@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq369co5e0.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:55:51AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 01:20:57PM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> >
> >> In conclusion, I think "--show-pulls" provides the right context for these
> >> extra merges to show in the history view. It also roots these merges in a
> >> Git-native name (that also happens to evoke the "pull request" concept that
> >> is _not_ native to Git).
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >
> > Yeah, after reading more of the thread, I think the simplest way to
> > think about is "keep merges that pulled in something" with the
> > implication of "(even if the other side didn't touch anything)".
>
> Isn't it more like "even if our side didn't touch anything", though?
I meant the _other_ other. :) I.e., the other one that is not what just
got pulled in. Which is the first parent. ;)
So yes, I think we are on the same page, and I just said it badly. Using
"our side" is better than trying to double-negate "other".
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-09 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-08 1:22 [PATCH] revision: --include-diversions adds helpful merges Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2020-04-08 1:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-08 1:39 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-04-08 15:28 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-04-08 19:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-08 20:05 ` Jeff King
2020-04-08 20:22 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-04-08 21:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-08 23:59 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-04-09 0:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-09 11:52 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-04-09 14:28 ` Philip Oakley
2020-04-09 15:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-09 17:20 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-04-09 18:24 ` Jeff King
2020-04-09 18:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-09 19:21 ` Jeff King [this message]
2020-04-08 2:13 ` brian m. carlson
2020-04-08 18:48 ` Jeff King
2020-04-09 0:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2020-04-10 12:19 ` [PATCH v3] revision: --show-pulls " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2020-04-10 20:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-10 21:43 ` Derrick Stolee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200409192149.GA4168991@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=dstolee@microsoft.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=philipoakley@iee.email \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).