From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEC21F619 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732454AbgCPTbq (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:31:46 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:41214 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1732446AbgCPTbq (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:31:46 -0400 Received: (qmail 23617 invoked by uid 109); 16 Mar 2020 19:31:45 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:31:45 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 671 invoked by uid 111); 16 Mar 2020 19:41:18 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:41:18 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:31:44 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Jakub Narebski Cc: James Ramsay , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Notes from Git Contributor Summit, Los Angeles (April 5, 2020) Message-ID: <20200316193144.GD1073710@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <86pndd794k.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86pndd794k.fsf@gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 07:42:19PM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote: > One question to all participating live (in person): how those topics > were proposed, and how they were voted for? This was done before remote > access was turned on, I think. During breakfast people wrote topics no a whiteboard and people voted on them by putting a tick-mark on the board. The topics and votes were transferred to the Google Doc for notes. Next time I think we'll just go straight to the online doc to save time and make things friendlier for remote folks (the whiteboard is a holdover from when we didn't have any remotes). And I'll make it clear that remote people are welcome to add topics and vote via the doc. -Peff