From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C961F61A for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726934AbgCMVZc (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:25:32 -0400 Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:41256 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726526AbgCMVZb (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:25:31 -0400 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B0D1F619; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:25:31 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: James Ramsay , Jeff King Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [TOPIC 16/17] =?utf-8?B?4oCcSSB3YW50?= =?utf-8?Q?_a_reviewer=E2=80=9D?= Message-ID: <20200313212531.GA22502@dcvr> References: <6DAC1E49-9CA0-4074-867E-F22CD26C9FEB@jramsay.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <6DAC1E49-9CA0-4074-867E-F22CD26C9FEB@jramsay.com.au> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org James Ramsay wrote: James: first off, thank you for these accessible summaries for non-JS users and those who could not attend for various reasons(*) > 6. Peff: this is all possible on the mailing list. I see things that look > interesting, and have a to do folder. If someone replies, I’ll take it off > the list. Once a week go through all the items. I like the book club idea, > instead of it being ad hoc, or by me, a group of a few people review the > list in the queue. You might want to use a separate tool, like IRC, but it > would be good to have it bring it back to the mailing list as a summary. > Public inbox could be better, but someone needs to write it. Maybe nerd > snipe Eric? What now? :o There's a lot of things it could be better at, but a more concrete idea of what you want would help. Right now I only have enough resources to do bugfixes along with scalability and performance improvements so more people can run it and keep it 100% reproducible and centralization resistant. I'm also planning on some local tooling along the lines of notmuch/mairix which is NNTP/HTTPS-aware but not sure when I'll be able to do that... (*) I stopped attending events over a decade ago for privacy reasons (facial recognition, invasive airport searches, etc.)