From: "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
To: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] t6022, t6046: test expected behavior instead of testing a proxy for it
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 18:12:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200313171248.GA613@szeder.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26d0c34cd1d4a54dab28d0c9c2242336244e8a3c.1582762465.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:14:23AM +0000, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
> diff --git a/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh b/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh
> index 6f196aaf276..d97cf48495b 100755
> --- a/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh
> +++ b/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh
> @@ -242,12 +242,23 @@ test_expect_success 'merge of identical changes in a renamed file' '
> rm -f A M N &&
> git reset --hard &&
> git checkout change+rename &&
> +
> + test-tool chmtime =31337 B &&
> + test-tool chmtime --get B >old-mtime &&
Here you compare the mtime of 'B' before ...
> GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge change >out &&
> - test_i18ngrep "^Skipped B" out &&
> +
> + test-tool chmtime --get B >new-mtime &&
> + test_cmp old-mtime new-mtime &&
... and after the merge.
> +
> git reset --hard HEAD^ &&
> git checkout change &&
> +
> + test-tool chmtime =-1 M &&
> + test-tool chmtime --get M >old-mtime &&
Here, however, you compare the mtime of 'M' before the merge ...
> GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge change+rename >out &&
> - test_i18ngrep ! "^Skipped B" out
> +
> + test-tool chmtime --get B >new-mtime &&
> + test $(cat old-mtime) -lt $(cat new-mtime)
... with the mtime of 'B' after the merge, i.e. the mtimes of two
different files.
Is that right?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-13 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-27 0:14 [PATCH 0/5] Testcase cleanups (merge related) Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-27 0:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] t602[1236], t6034: modernize test formatting Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-27 0:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] t6020, t6022, t6035: update merge tests to use test helper functions Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-27 0:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] t3035: prefer test_must_fail to bash negation for git commands Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-02-27 0:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] t6022, t6046: test expected behavior instead of testing a proxy for it Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-12 13:20 ` SZEDER Gábor
2020-03-12 16:48 ` Elijah Newren
2020-03-12 17:35 ` Elijah Newren
2020-03-12 20:01 ` SZEDER Gábor
2020-03-13 17:17 ` SZEDER Gábor
2020-03-13 17:45 ` Elijah Newren
2020-03-13 17:12 ` SZEDER Gábor [this message]
2020-03-13 17:18 ` Elijah Newren
2020-03-13 17:30 ` SZEDER Gábor
2020-03-13 18:11 ` Elijah Newren
2020-02-27 0:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] t6020: new test with interleaved lexicographic ordering of directories Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200313171248.GA613@szeder.dev \
--to=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).