From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E021F619 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727124AbgCJTs6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:48:58 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:35752 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1726545AbgCJTs6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:48:58 -0400 Received: (qmail 26021 invoked by uid 109); 10 Mar 2020 19:48:58 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:48:58 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 14531 invoked by uid 111); 10 Mar 2020 19:58:17 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:58:17 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:48:57 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Elijah Newren , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.26.0-rc1 Message-ID: <20200310194857.GD549010@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20200310174017.GA549010@coredump.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:08:41PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Hmph. It might have been way premature to switch the default, then. > > Introducing rebase.backend to allow adventurous to opt in early, > while keeping the default backend same, may not be a bad way to > avoid the regression in the upcoming release and to give us enough > time deal with it after the release, perhaps? Yeah, certainly that's the conservative route, and I don't mind it. -Peff