From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952211F4C0 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 00:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726275AbfJTAUH (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Oct 2019 20:20:07 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:56617 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726195AbfJTAUH (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Oct 2019 20:20:07 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE1519939; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 20:20:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tmz@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=n5t5TzHVHLHF4 OzGLq7wRzx2qNo=; b=Y6a8C7TjiIyt18/owmBfrBbo2QAYo6wGKdcFCCpM/RCg9 i4naJZ+w/KhlrCei1Jz9Q+25JwuI+/FhJjnYt4qAw+RmgS1DX4DCepVRz8bxrIvt 19kD7TDuGaHlc7eTBQfg/S+K1YUyiMWCskx4AwhMLCxLQAyCr3dIBiBHnovTeg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=L2UsTYc MzPyCxDEg2EMEPe+mqO9amt1Lc0XK1q38pC4kX6A4Ls1Rf7/s2krOQvC0XQkLePi kQgzVXlMi9tfy5ZQNjmIm7JhlU/ToFn0TWpY/8hsO7qxS2lEfoFovrftw7mqh7l2 5ZKkol92kvg9CtV9Posx22wmulPN4KY/487I= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A927D19938; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 20:20:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tmz@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [173.67.141.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5DFE819932; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 20:20:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tmz@pobox.com) Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 20:19:59 -0400 From: Todd Zullinger To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Cc: SZEDER =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor?= , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] test-progress: fix test failures on big-endian systems Message-ID: <20191020001959.GY10893@pobox.com> References: <20190731071755.GF4545@pobox.com> <20191019233706.GM29845@szeder.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5BD5BF84-F2CF-11E9-ADA4-C28CBED8090B-09356542!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi G=E1bor! >=20 > On 10/20/19 1:37 AM, SZEDER G=E1bor wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:38:40PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wr= ote: >>> The testsuite is failing again on s390x and all other big-endian targ= ets in >>> Debian. For a full build log on s390x see [1]. >>=20 >> Gah, my progress display fixes strike again... >>=20 >> I think the patch below should fix it, but I could only test it on >> little-endian systems. Could you please confirm that it indeed works >> on big-endian as well? [...] > I can confirm that your patch fixes the testsuite for me on Debian > unstable/ppc64 (big-endian). >=20 > Tested-By: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Yep, that worked well on the Fedora s390x builders as well (unsurprisingly). Thanks! --=20 Todd