git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/23] parse_tag_buffer(): treat NULL tag pointer as parse error
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:45:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191018044534.GC17879@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191018044103.GA17625@sigill.intra.peff.net>

When parsing a tag, we may end up with a NULL "tagged" field when
there's a type mismatch (e.g., the tag claims to point to object X as a
commit, but we previously saw X as a blob in the same process), but we
do not otherwise indicate a parse failure to the caller.

This is similar to the case discussed in the previous commit, where a
commit could end up with a NULL tree field: while slightly convenient
for callers who want to overlook a corrupt object, it means that normal
callers have to explicitly deal with this case (rather than just relying
on the return code from parsing). And most don't, leading to segfault
fixes like the one in c77722b3ea (use get_tagged_oid(), 2019-09-05).

Let's address this more centrally, by returning an error code from the
parse itself, which most callers would already notice (adventurous
callers are free to ignore the error and continue looking at the
struct).

This also covers the case where the tag contains a nonsensical "type"
field (there we produced a user-visible error but still returned success
to the caller; now we'll produce a slightly better message and return an
error).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
---
It's possible that c77722b3ea fixed all of the segfaults here, though of
course new callers must remember to use it instead of accessing
tag->tagged directly. We could _possibly_ get rid of that check now, but
that assumes that all of the caller notice parse_tag() or parse_object()
failing. Having both gives us belt-and-suspenders protection against a
segfault.

 tag.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tag.c b/tag.c
index bfa0e31435..6a51efda8d 100644
--- a/tag.c
+++ b/tag.c
@@ -167,10 +167,15 @@ int parse_tag_buffer(struct repository *r, struct tag *item, const void *data, u
 	} else if (!strcmp(type, tag_type)) {
 		item->tagged = (struct object *)lookup_tag(r, &oid);
 	} else {
-		error("Unknown type %s", type);
-		item->tagged = NULL;
+		return error("unknown tag type '%s' in %s",
+			     type, oid_to_hex(&item->object.oid));
 	}
 
+	if (!item->tagged)
+		return error("bad tag pointer to %s in %s",
+			     oid_to_hex(&oid),
+			     oid_to_hex(&item->object.oid));
+
 	if (bufptr + 4 < tail && starts_with(bufptr, "tag "))
 		; 		/* good */
 	else
-- 
2.23.0.1228.gee29b05929


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-18  5:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-18  4:41 [PATCH 0/23] parsing and fsck cleanups Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:42 ` [PATCH 01/23] parse_commit_buffer(): treat lookup_commit() failure as parse error Jeff King
2019-10-24  3:37   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-24 18:01     ` Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:43 ` [PATCH 02/23] parse_commit_buffer(): treat lookup_tree() " Jeff King
2019-10-24 23:12   ` Jonathan Tan
2019-10-24 23:22     ` Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:45 ` Jeff King [this message]
2019-10-18  4:47 ` [PATCH 04/23] remember commit/tag parse failures Jeff King
2019-10-24  3:51   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-24 23:25   ` Jonathan Tan
2019-10-24 23:41     ` Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:48 ` [PATCH 05/23] fsck: stop checking commit->tree value Jeff King
2019-10-24  3:57   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-18  4:49 ` [PATCH 06/23] fsck: stop checking commit->parent counts Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:51 ` [PATCH 07/23] fsck: stop checking tag->tagged Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:54 ` [PATCH 08/23] fsck: require an actual buffer for non-blobs Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:56 ` [PATCH 09/23] fsck: unify object-name code Jeff King
2019-10-24  6:05   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-24 18:07     ` Jeff King
2019-10-25  3:23       ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-25 21:20         ` Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:56 ` [PATCH 10/23] fsck_describe_object(): build on our get_object_name() primitive Jeff King
2019-10-24  6:06   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-10-18  4:57 ` [PATCH 11/23] fsck: use oids rather than objects for object_name API Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:58 ` [PATCH 12/23] fsck: don't require object structs for display functions Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:58 ` [PATCH 13/23] fsck: only provide oid/type in fsck_error callback Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:58 ` [PATCH 14/23] fsck: only require an oid for skiplist functions Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:59 ` [PATCH 15/23] fsck: don't require an object struct for report() Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:59 ` [PATCH 16/23] fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct blob" for fsck_blob() Jeff King
2019-10-18  4:59 ` [PATCH 17/23] fsck: drop blob struct from fsck_finish() Jeff King
2019-10-18  5:00 ` [PATCH 18/23] fsck: don't require an object struct for fsck_ident() Jeff King
2019-10-18  5:00 ` [PATCH 19/23] fsck: don't require an object struct in verify_headers() Jeff King
2019-10-18  5:00 ` [PATCH 20/23] fsck: rename vague "oid" local variables Jeff King
2019-10-18  5:01 ` [PATCH 21/23] fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct tag" for fsck_tag() Jeff King
2019-10-18  5:01 ` [PATCH 22/23] fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct commit" for fsck_commit() Jeff King
2019-10-18  5:02 ` [PATCH 23/23] fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct tree" for fsck_tree() Jeff King
2019-10-24 23:49 ` [PATCH 0/23] parsing and fsck cleanups Jonathan Tan
2019-10-25  3:11 ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191018044534.GC17879@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).