git@vger.kernel.org list mirror (unofficial, one of many)
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dir: special case check for the possibility that pathspec is NULL
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:31:05 -0700
Message-ID: <20190930223105.GA86525@generichostname> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190930191106.16128-1-newren@gmail.com>

Hi Elijah,

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:11:06PM -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> Commits 404ebceda01c ("dir: also check directories for matching
> pathspecs", 2019-09-17) and 89a1f4aaf765 ("dir: if our pathspec might
> match files under a dir, recurse into it", 2019-09-17) added calls to
> match_pathspec() and do_match_pathspec() passing along their pathspec
> parameter.  Both match_pathspec() and do_match_pathspec() assume the
> pathspec argument they are given is non-NULL.  It turns out that
> unpack-tree.c's verify_clean_subdirectory() calls read_directory() with
> pathspec == NULL, and it is possible on case insensitive filesystems for
> that NULL to make it to these new calls to match_pathspec() and
> do_match_pathspec().  Add appropriate checks on the NULLness of pathspec
> to avoid a segfault.
> 
> In case the negation throws anyone off (one of the calls was to
> do_match_pathspec() while the other was to !match_pathspec(), yet no
> negation of the NULLness of pathspec is used), there are two ways to
> understand the differences:
>   * The code already handled the pathspec == NULL cases before this
>     series, and this series only tried to change behavior when there was
>     a pathspec, thus we only want to go into the if-block if pathspec is
>     non-NULL.
>   * One of the calls is for whether to recurse into a subdirectory, the
>     other is for after we've recursed into it for whether we want to
>     remove the subdirectory itself (i.e. the subdirectory didn't match
>     but something under it could have).  That difference in situation
>     leads to the slight differences in logic used (well, that and the
>     slightly unusual fact that we don't want empty pathspecs to remove
>     untracked directories by default).
> 
> Helped-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
> Helped-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
> ---
> This patch applies on top of en/clean-nested-with-ignored, which is now
> in next.
> 
> Denton found and analyzed one issue and provided the patch for the
> match_pathspec() call, SZEDER figured out why the issue only reproduced
> for some folks and not others and provided the testcase, and I looked
> through the remainder of the series and noted the do_match_pathspec()
> call that should have the same check.

Thanks for catching what I missed.

> 
> So, I'm not sure who should be author and who should be helped-by; I
> feel like their contributions are possibly bigger than mine.  While I
> tried to reproduce and debug, they ended up doing the work, and I just
> looked through the rest of the series for similar issues and wrote up
> a commit message.  *shrug*

Eh, it doesn't really matter to me. GitHub appears to have de facto
standardised the Co-authored-by: trailer to allow credit to be split
amonst multiple authors so _maybe_ we could use that, but I'm pretty
impartial.

> 
>  dir.c                 |  8 +++++---
>  t/t0050-filesystem.sh | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c
> index 7ff79170fc..bd39b86be4 100644
> --- a/dir.c
> +++ b/dir.c
> @@ -1962,8 +1962,9 @@ static enum path_treatment read_directory_recursive(struct dir_struct *dir,
>  			((state == path_untracked) &&
>  			 (get_dtype(cdir.de, istate, path.buf, path.len) == DT_DIR) &&
>  			 ((dir->flags & DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO) ||
> -			  do_match_pathspec(istate, pathspec, path.buf, path.len,
> -					    baselen, NULL, DO_MATCH_LEADING_PATHSPEC) == MATCHED_RECURSIVELY_LEADING_PATHSPEC))) {
> +			  (pathspec &&
> +			   do_match_pathspec(istate, pathspec, path.buf, path.len,
> +					     baselen, NULL, DO_MATCH_LEADING_PATHSPEC) == MATCHED_RECURSIVELY_LEADING_PATHSPEC)))) {
>  			struct untracked_cache_dir *ud;
>  			ud = lookup_untracked(dir->untracked, untracked,
>  					      path.buf + baselen,
> @@ -1975,7 +1976,8 @@ static enum path_treatment read_directory_recursive(struct dir_struct *dir,
>  			if (subdir_state > dir_state)
>  				dir_state = subdir_state;
>  
> -			if (!match_pathspec(istate, pathspec, path.buf, path.len,
> +			if (pathspec &&
> +			    !match_pathspec(istate, pathspec, path.buf, path.len,
>  					    0 /* prefix */, NULL,
>  					    0 /* do NOT special case dirs */))
>  				state = path_none;
> diff --git a/t/t0050-filesystem.sh b/t/t0050-filesystem.sh
> index 192c94eccd..edb30f9eb2 100755
> --- a/t/t0050-filesystem.sh
> +++ b/t/t0050-filesystem.sh
> @@ -131,4 +131,27 @@ $test_unicode 'merge (silent unicode normalization)' '
>  	git merge topic
>  '
>  
> +test_expect_success CASE_INSENSITIVE_FS 'checkout with no pathspec and a case insensitive fs' '
> +	git init repo &&
> +	(
> +		cd repo &&
> +
> +		>Gitweb &&
> +		git add Gitweb &&
> +		git commit -m "add Gitweb" &&
> +
> +		git checkout --orphan todo &&
> +		git reset --hard &&
> +		# the subdir is crucial, without it there is no segfault

We should either remove this comment or change the justification. A
future reader may be confused at what particular segfault this refers
to.

> +		mkdir -p gitweb/subdir &&
> +		>gitweb/subdir/file &&
> +		# it is not strictly necessary to add and commit the
> +		# gitweb directory, its presence is sufficient

Same here, its presence is sufficient to... what?

Thanks,

Denton

> +		git add gitweb &&
> +		git commit -m "add gitweb/subdir/file" &&
> +
> +		git checkout master
> +	)
> +'
> +
>  test_done
> -- 
> 2.22.1.14.g885c22d24b
> 

  reply index

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-25 18:59 [PATCH] t7300-clean: demonstrate deleting nested repo with an ignored file breakage SZEDER Gábor
2019-08-25 20:34 ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-08-25 22:32 ` Philip Oakley
2019-08-26  7:48   ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-09-05 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/12] Fix some git clean issues Elijah Newren
2019-09-05 15:47   ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/12] t7300: Add some testcases showing failure to clean specified pathspecs Elijah Newren
2019-09-05 15:47   ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/12] dir: fix typo in comment Elijah Newren
2019-09-05 15:47   ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/12] dir: fix off-by-one error in match_pathspec_item Elijah Newren
2019-09-05 15:47   ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/12] dir: Directories should be checked for matching pathspecs too Elijah Newren
2019-09-05 15:47   ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/12] dir: Make the DO_MATCH_SUBMODULE code reusable for a non-submodule case Elijah Newren
2019-09-05 15:47   ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/12] dir: If our pathspec might match files under a dir, recurse into it Elijah Newren
2019-09-05 15:47   ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/12] dir: add commentary explaining match_pathspec_item's return value Elijah Newren
2019-09-05 15:47   ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/12] git-clean.txt: do not claim we will delete files with -n/--dry-run Elijah Newren
2019-09-05 15:47   ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/12] clean: disambiguate the definition of -d Elijah Newren
2019-09-05 15:47   ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/12] clean: avoid removing untracked files in a nested git repository Elijah Newren
2019-09-05 21:20     ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-09-05 15:47   ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/12] clean: rewrap overly long line Elijah Newren
2019-09-05 15:47   ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/12] clean: fix theoretical path corruption Elijah Newren
2019-09-05 19:27     ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-09-07  0:34       ` Elijah Newren
2019-09-05 19:01   ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/12] Fix some git clean issues SZEDER Gábor
2019-09-07  0:33     ` Elijah Newren
2019-09-12 22:12   ` [PATCH v3 " Elijah Newren
2019-09-12 22:12     ` [PATCH v3 01/12] t7300: add testcases showing failure to clean specified pathspecs Elijah Newren
2019-09-13 18:54       ` Junio C Hamano
2019-09-13 19:10         ` Elijah Newren
2019-09-13 20:29           ` Junio C Hamano
2019-09-12 22:12     ` [PATCH v3 02/12] dir: fix typo in comment Elijah Newren
2019-09-12 22:12     ` [PATCH v3 03/12] dir: fix off-by-one error in match_pathspec_item Elijah Newren
2019-09-13 19:05       ` Junio C Hamano
2019-09-12 22:12     ` [PATCH v3 04/12] dir: also check directories for matching pathspecs Elijah Newren
2019-09-12 22:12     ` [PATCH v3 05/12] dir: make the DO_MATCH_SUBMODULE code reusable for a non-submodule case Elijah Newren
2019-09-12 22:12     ` [PATCH v3 06/12] dir: if our pathspec might match files under a dir, recurse into it Elijah Newren
2019-09-13 19:45       ` Junio C Hamano
2019-09-12 22:12     ` [PATCH v3 07/12] dir: add commentary explaining match_pathspec_item's return value Elijah Newren
2019-09-13 20:04       ` Junio C Hamano
2019-09-12 22:12     ` [PATCH v3 08/12] git-clean.txt: do not claim we will delete files with -n/--dry-run Elijah Newren
2019-09-12 22:12     ` [PATCH v3 09/12] clean: disambiguate the definition of -d Elijah Newren
2019-09-12 22:12     ` [PATCH v3 10/12] clean: avoid removing untracked files in a nested git repository Elijah Newren
2019-09-12 22:12     ` [PATCH v3 11/12] clean: rewrap overly long line Elijah Newren
2019-09-12 22:12     ` [PATCH v3 12/12] clean: fix theoretical path corruption Elijah Newren
2019-09-17 16:34     ` [PATCH v4 00/12] Fix some git clean issues Elijah Newren
2019-09-17 16:34       ` [PATCH v4 01/12] t7300: add testcases showing failure to clean specified pathspecs Elijah Newren
2019-09-17 16:34       ` [PATCH v4 02/12] dir: fix typo in comment Elijah Newren
2019-09-17 16:34       ` [PATCH v4 03/12] dir: fix off-by-one error in match_pathspec_item Elijah Newren
2019-09-17 16:34       ` [PATCH v4 04/12] dir: also check directories for matching pathspecs Elijah Newren
2019-09-25 20:39         ` [BUG] git is segfaulting, was " Denton Liu
2019-09-25 21:28           ` Elijah Newren
2019-09-25 21:55             ` Denton Liu
2019-09-26 20:35               ` Denton Liu
2019-09-27  0:12                 ` Elijah Newren
2019-09-27  1:09           ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-09-27  2:17             ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-09-27 17:10               ` Denton Liu
2019-09-30 19:11                 ` [PATCH] dir: special case check for the possibility that pathspec is NULL Elijah Newren
2019-09-30 22:31                   ` Denton Liu [this message]
2019-10-01  7:01                     ` Elijah Newren
2019-10-01 18:30                   ` [PATCH v2] " Elijah Newren
2019-10-01 18:40                     ` Denton Liu
2019-10-01 18:54                       ` Elijah Newren
2019-10-01 18:55                       ` [PATCH v3] " Elijah Newren
2019-10-01 19:35                         ` Denton Liu
2019-10-01 19:39                           ` Elijah Newren
2019-10-02 15:51                             ` Elijah Newren
2019-10-07 18:04                         ` SZEDER Gábor
2019-09-17 16:34       ` [PATCH v4 05/12] dir: make the DO_MATCH_SUBMODULE code reusable for a non-submodule case Elijah Newren
2019-09-17 16:34       ` [PATCH v4 06/12] dir: if our pathspec might match files under a dir, recurse into it Elijah Newren
2019-09-17 16:34       ` [PATCH v4 07/12] dir: add commentary explaining match_pathspec_item's return value Elijah Newren
2019-09-17 16:35       ` [PATCH v4 08/12] git-clean.txt: do not claim we will delete files with -n/--dry-run Elijah Newren
2019-09-17 16:35       ` [PATCH v4 09/12] clean: disambiguate the definition of -d Elijah Newren
2019-09-17 16:35       ` [PATCH v4 10/12] clean: avoid removing untracked files in a nested git repository Elijah Newren
2019-09-17 16:35       ` [PATCH v4 11/12] clean: rewrap overly long line Elijah Newren
2019-09-17 16:35       ` [PATCH v4 12/12] clean: fix theoretical path corruption Elijah Newren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190930223105.GA86525@generichostname \
    --to=liu.denton@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

git@vger.kernel.org list mirror (unofficial, one of many)

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://public-inbox.org/git
	git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/git

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroups are available over NNTP:
	nntp://news.public-inbox.org/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git

 note: .onion URLs require Tor: https://www.torproject.org/

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git