git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
To: "Martin Ågren" <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	stefanbeller@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] t7503: add tests for pre-merge-hook
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:43:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190729234319.GJ43313@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN0heSoU7XUN8GOFzzBrLG0RbY65hhYUn_-_Ax1DfFsNZ64hpA@mail.gmail.com>

On 2019.07.29 22:04, Martin Ågren wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 00:57, Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com> wrote:
> > +test_expect_success '--no-verify with succeeding hook (merge)' '
> > +
> > +       git checkout side &&
> > +       git merge --no-verify -m "merge master" master &&
> > +       git checkout master
> > +
> > +'
> 
> This test doesn't even try to verify that the hook was actually ignored.
> That left me puzzled for a while...
> 
> > +test_expect_success '--no-verify with failing hook (merge)' '
> > +
> > +       git checkout side &&
> > +       git merge --no-verify -m "merge master" master &&
> > +       git checkout master
> > +
> > +'
> 
> ... but this would then (most likely) fail, so we would notice
> something's wrong.
> 
> This script seems to me like if it passes 100%, we can be fairly sure
> we're ok, but if some individual test fails, we shouldn't be surprised
> if its oneline description is a bit off compared to the bug. Similarly,
> quite a few tests could pass, despite their oneline description inducing
> the thought of "but surely, if /that/ were the problem, /those/ tests
> would fail".
> 
> Anyway, I realize this is just following the existing approach. I guess
> you could argue it has served us well for a long time.
> 
> I would probably prefer seeing the various hunks in this patch being
> squashed into the relevant commits (1/4 vs 3/4) to make those patches
> more self-describing.

Will squash these as you said in V3. Will also think about whether
another test approach would make more sense here.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-29 23:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-22 12:04 [PATCH 0/4] pre-merge hook Michael J Gruber
2017-09-22 12:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] git-merge: Honor " Michael J Gruber
2017-09-22 19:52   ` Stefan Beller
2017-09-23  0:04   ` Martin Ågren
2017-09-22 12:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] merge: do no-verify like commit Michael J Gruber
2017-09-22 19:55   ` Stefan Beller
2017-09-22 12:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] merge: --no-verify to bypass pre-merge hook Michael J Gruber
2017-09-23 23:48   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-09-25 10:54     ` Michael J Gruber
2017-09-22 12:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] t7503: add tests for pre-merge-hook Michael J Gruber
2017-09-22 20:01   ` Stefan Beller
2017-10-02  5:54 ` [PATCH 0/4] pre-merge hook Junio C Hamano
2017-10-02 16:59   ` Stefan Beller
2017-10-17  4:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-07-18 22:57   ` [PATCH v2 " Josh Steadmon
2019-07-18 23:56   ` Josh Steadmon
2019-07-18 22:57     ` [PATCH v2 1/4] git-merge: Honor " Josh Steadmon
2019-07-29 20:00       ` Martin Ågren
2019-07-18 22:57     ` [PATCH v2 2/4] merge: do no-verify like commit Josh Steadmon
2019-07-18 22:57     ` [PATCH v2 3/4] merge: --no-verify to bypass pre-merge hook Josh Steadmon
2019-07-29 20:02       ` Martin Ågren
2019-07-29 23:33         ` Josh Steadmon
2019-07-18 22:57     ` [PATCH v2 4/4] t7503: add tests for pre-merge-hook Josh Steadmon
2019-07-29 20:04       ` Martin Ågren
2019-07-29 23:43         ` Josh Steadmon [this message]
2019-07-30  7:13           ` Martin Ågren
2019-07-31 18:34             ` Josh Steadmon
2019-07-29 20:09     ` [PATCH v2 0/4] pre-merge hook Martin Ågren
2019-07-29 23:29       ` Josh Steadmon
2019-07-29 20:29     ` Martin Ågren
2019-07-29 23:39       ` Josh Steadmon
2019-08-01 22:20     ` [PATCH v3 0/4] pre-merge-commit hook Josh Steadmon
2019-08-01 22:20       ` [PATCH v3 1/4] t7503: verify proper hook execution Josh Steadmon
2019-08-02  9:43         ` Martin Ågren
2019-08-01 22:20       ` [PATCH v3 2/4] merge: do no-verify like commit Josh Steadmon
2019-08-01 22:20       ` [PATCH v3 3/4] git-merge: honor pre-merge-commit hook Josh Steadmon
2019-08-02  9:45         ` Martin Ågren
2019-08-02 22:20           ` Josh Steadmon
2019-08-01 22:20       ` [PATCH v3 4/4] merge: --no-verify to bypass " Josh Steadmon
2019-08-02  9:56       ` [PATCH v3 0/4] " Martin Ågren
2019-08-02  9:56         ` [PATCH 1/5] t7503: use "&&" in "test_when_finished" rather than ";" Martin Ågren
2019-08-02  9:56         ` [PATCH 2/5] t7503: avoid touch when mtime doesn't matter Martin Ågren
2019-08-02  9:56         ` [PATCH 3/5] t7503: simplify file-juggling Martin Ågren
2019-08-02  9:56         ` [PATCH 4/5] t7503: don't create "actual_hooks" for later appending Martin Ågren
2019-08-02  9:56         ` [PATCH 5/5] t7503: test failing merge with both hooks available Martin Ågren
2019-08-02 22:18         ` [PATCH v3 0/4] pre-merge-commit hook Josh Steadmon
2019-08-05 22:43       ` [PATCH v4 " Josh Steadmon
2019-08-05 22:43         ` [PATCH v4 1/4] t7503: verify proper hook execution Josh Steadmon
2019-08-06 18:14           ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-07 18:11             ` Josh Steadmon
2019-08-05 22:43         ` [PATCH v4 2/4] merge: do no-verify like commit Josh Steadmon
2019-08-05 22:43         ` [PATCH v4 3/4] git-merge: honor pre-merge-commit hook Josh Steadmon
2019-08-05 22:43         ` [PATCH v4 4/4] merge: --no-verify to bypass " Josh Steadmon
2019-08-07 18:57         ` [PATCH v5 0/4] " Josh Steadmon
2019-08-07 18:57           ` [PATCH v5 1/4] t7503: verify proper hook execution Josh Steadmon
2019-08-07 18:57           ` [PATCH v5 2/4] merge: do no-verify like commit Josh Steadmon
2019-08-07 18:57           ` [PATCH v5 3/4] git-merge: honor pre-merge-commit hook Josh Steadmon
2019-08-07 18:57           ` [PATCH v5 4/4] merge: --no-verify to bypass " Josh Steadmon
2019-08-08 13:08           ` [PATCH v5 0/4] " Martin Ågren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190729234319.GJ43313@google.com \
    --to=steadmon@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=martin.agren@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefanbeller@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).