From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jeff Hostetler" <jeffhost@microsoft.com>,
"Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] trace2: fix tracing when NO_PTHREADS is defined
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 17:27:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190521212744.GC14807@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.222.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:33:58PM -0700, Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget wrote:
> As Duy suggested, pthread_getspecific() just returns NULL when NO_PTHREADS
> is defined. And pthread_setspecific() silently does not nothing. So this
> problem was hidden from view.
>
> I have to wonder if we should update pthread_*specific() to call BUG() when
> NO_PTHREADS is defined as a way to catch unguarded usages easier or make
> this issue more clear.
I think it should actually store the data asked for by the caller, as if
we were the single thread running. We discussed this as the time of
refactoring NO_PTHREADS, but there was only one caller that would have
benefited. Now there are two. ;)
Discussion in the subthread of this patch:
https://public-inbox.org/git/20181027071003.1347-2-pclouds@gmail.com/
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-21 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-21 19:33 [PATCH 0/1] trace2: fix tracing when NO_PTHREADS is defined Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-05-21 19:33 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget
2019-05-21 21:27 ` Jeff King [this message]
2019-05-22 13:23 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Jeff Hostetler
2019-05-23 5:51 ` Jeff King
2019-05-23 13:55 ` Jeff Hostetler
2019-05-25 10:43 ` Duy Nguyen
2019-05-28 6:28 ` Jeff King
2019-05-28 14:57 ` Jeff Hostetler
2019-05-28 17:14 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190521212744.GC14807@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jeffhost@microsoft.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).