From: Jonathan Nieder <email@example.com>
To: "Eric S. Raymond" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Separate commit identification from Merkle hashing
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 19:58:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190521025813.GA175422@google.com> (raw)
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <email@example.com>:
>> Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>>> One reason I am sure of this is the SHA-1 to whatever transition.
>>> We can't count on the successor hash to survive attack forever.
>> Have you read through Documentation/technical/hash-function-transition? It
>> takes the case where the new hash function is found to be weak into account.
>> Hope that helps,
> Reading now...
Take your time. :)
> I think it's a weakness, though, that most of it is written as though it
> assumes only one hash transition will be necessary. (This is me thinking
> on long timescales again.)
Hm, can you point to what part of the doc suggested that? Best to make
the text clearer, to avoid confusing the next person.
On the contrary, the design is very careful to be able to support the
> The same technique (probably the
> same code!) could be used to map the otherwise uninterpreted
> commit-IDs I'm proposing to lookup keys.
No, since Git relies on commit IDs for integrity checking. The hash
function transition described in that document relies on
round-tripping ability for the duration of the transition.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-21 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-21 1:32 RFC: Separate commit identification from Merkle hashing Eric S. Raymond
2019-05-21 1:57 ` Jonathan Nieder
2019-05-21 2:38 ` Eric S. Raymond
2019-05-21 2:58 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2019-05-21 3:31 ` Eric S. Raymond
2019-05-23 19:09 ` Jakub Narebski
2019-05-23 20:09 ` Jonathan Nieder
2019-05-23 20:53 ` Eric S. Raymond
2019-05-23 20:50 ` Eric S. Raymond
2019-05-23 20:54 ` Jonathan Nieder
2019-05-23 21:19 ` Eric S. Raymond
2019-05-23 21:39 ` Randall S. Becker
2019-05-23 21:50 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).