From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8120E20248 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2019 12:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726329AbfDGMRr (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Apr 2019 08:17:47 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:38159 "EHLO mail-pf1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726049AbfDGMRr (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Apr 2019 08:17:47 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id 10so5961580pfo.5 for ; Sun, 07 Apr 2019 05:17:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=VglZV+v7KFkJFKuScGURKUdIm8BTTbfm1aEDplyVZLY=; b=qhLQqDaQ9AX3SzgosRmJHMhSyBAOm0Ds+fLl8qWl93mZYUZDZ7Njlb0GceUbK5t6Cg +L/D6DopjooE+Tvd8Vrz8eiGYkdD27ysUpzd4SOqMRrZ4EyIKzdK8hjujj7X3MDDzumb gthggy9m9B60oys1gnQMffu9aRiaeLMZuyhas/IXmWYUD3L40Sj8KWnr5wtZCHUNHHGH qNAoIvhxB9ojy/WlGhdEbRcViXkHYAVFdVdiKEfGe6u/hNWmlZj8LuXT+OWTfYy/3QAV 9VS4ENesFnr/n4RxvFwUUMwCZUVjtI5/EUiuR4sBRQlCMcVgQaoiuUAGJM786A1IxVkY XDgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=VglZV+v7KFkJFKuScGURKUdIm8BTTbfm1aEDplyVZLY=; b=oGS52o2O7HcZbfdNQAf5qprPT8vQzd+f0w5Uuk6yBHNZ+Cu+TskPgnx0NvTv1ENAvr wCk0FlmPeSBOEDB3c/TcTiO14RNTByA9GsmbBwqJvAoHELE645sk7ZERGnmBhCL/GKwb UJj+OB1ehszy39j6cla+9YrmspxsepkIsERfZ0s/BpLkE/zZgVjObsZEwTx+k3zYkTSe TbQqsZm9JYls1Z7PHMzmJEtdl1hiHJZ20wrHQvZzlfaed0U280b4vAL/oyroaVJyYsp5 +MLAHGE8V4BJHhDmRBGNyq65Eb+r9bBTPsuhsJXnBm7vAxuzwS4lj2BZg1h0D3Nbh88d a+0g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAURVXoO9ku62Flf2TtXt51ylx/HiNVlL5Uk2xF+FJOs32hNC6mx s4S935IYDf/R/KCZn3ntkaA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwX3xh5xzsslMTLt0UrO4nvG45fy9SZxMyeNatI5uX4mcKO6covPpko1QXO9PZ1PpZn5YCfCg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:243:: with SMTP id 64mr22553717pgc.214.1554639466338; Sun, 07 Apr 2019 05:17:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ar135.iitr.local ([103.37.201.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q74sm22450378pfc.111.2019.04.07.05.17.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 07 Apr 2019 05:17:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Rohit Ashiwal To: christian.couder@gmail.com Cc: Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de, alban.gruin@gmail.com, artagnon@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org, newren@gmail.com, rafa.almas@gmail.com, rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com, s-beyer@gmx.net, t.gummerer@gmail.com Subject: Re: [GSoC][RFC v3] Proposal: Improve consistency of sequencer commands Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 17:46:40 +0530 Message-Id: <20190407121640.3737-1-rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: References: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hey Chris! On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 09:15:30 +0200 Christian Couder wrote: > As we are close to the deadline (April 9th) for proposal submissions, > I think it's a good idea to already upload your draft proposal on the > GSoC site. I think you will be able to upload newer versions until the > deadline, but uploading soon avoid possible last minute issues and > mistakes. Sure, I'll upload my proposal as soon as possible. > It looks like you copy pasted the Git Rev News article without > updating the content. The improvement has been released a long time > ago. The intention was to document how the project started and *major* milestones or turning points of the project. Here they are. > Maybe s/rebases/rebase/ Yes, :P > It seems to me that there has been more recent work than this and also > perhaps interesting suggestions and discussions about possible > sequencer related improvements on the mailing list. Again the idea was to document earlier stages of project, "recent" discussions have been on the optimizations which are not exactly relevant. Should I write more about recent developments? Regards Rohit