From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4258320248 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726711AbfCMTk0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:40:26 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:49424 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1726396AbfCMTk0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:40:26 -0400 Received: (qmail 21163 invoked by uid 109); 13 Mar 2019 19:40:27 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:40:27 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 15178 invoked by uid 111); 13 Mar 2019 19:39:30 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) SMTP; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:39:30 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:39:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:39:09 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin , Roberto Tyley Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] point pull requesters to Git Git Gadget Message-ID: <20190313193909.GB3400@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20190312213246.GA6252@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:49:22AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > infrequent contributors. And there are a few reasons to prefer GGG: > > > > 1. submitGit seems to still have a few rough edges. E.g., it doesn't > > munge timestamps to help threaded mail readers handled out-of-order > > delivery. > > Hmph, I had an impression that the recent "why aren't these sorted" > topics were via GGG, not submitGit, though. We did have one case a few months ago, but I think it was since fixed. Whereas it cannot be fixed for submitGit without major re-architecting, because the mails go out through Amazon SES, which writes its own timestamp. I could be wrong about GGG being fixed though. I haven't noticed the problem lately, but we definitely had a submitGit-related one a few weeks ago. -Peff