From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Cc: Git Mailing list <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: is it "git gc --prune=now" or "git gc --prune=all"?
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 00:03:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190305050326.GK19800@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1903020323110.16672@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 03:26:37AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> more pedantry, but digging through "git gc", the man page reads:
>
> --prune=<date>
> Prune loose objects older than date (default is 2 weeks
> ago, overridable by the config variable gc.pruneExpire).
> --prune=all prunes loose objects regardless of their age
> ^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> but the code for gc.c contains a check for "now" (which actually makes
> more sense semantically):
>
> static void add_repack_all_option(struct string_list *keep_pack)
> {
> if (prune_expire && !strcmp(prune_expire, "now"))
> argv_array_push(&repack, "-a");
> else {
> ... snip ...
>
> while the man page does not seem to mention the possible value of
> "now".
>
> am i misreading something? should the man page mention the possible
> value of "now" as opposed to "all"?
Using "all" would also work. It wouldn't shortcut to using "-a" (which
lets pack-objects save a little work), but it is handled in
parse_expiry_date() the same as "now". I do think the documentation
should recommend "now". Possibly builtin/gc.c should be smarter about
recognizing "all" in the conditional you quoted, too, though I don't
know that it's all that important (especially if we tweak the
documentation).
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-05 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-02 8:26 is it "git gc --prune=now" or "git gc --prune=all"? Robert P. J. Day
2019-03-05 5:03 ` Jeff King [this message]
2019-03-06 0:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-03-09 18:13 ` Robert P. J. Day
2019-03-11 2:18 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190305050326.GK19800@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).