From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: 2.11-era rebase regression when @{upstream} is implicitly used
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:10:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190221141042.GA21737@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877ee2jyh3.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 02:23:04PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> This is not a 2.21 release issue, and pre-dates the built-in rebase.
>
> When you clone any repository, e.g. git.git, and add one commit on top
> of the cloned branch, then run "git rebase" you'll get e.g.:
>
> $ git rebase
> First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
> Applying: foo
>
> Before 4f21454b55 ("merge-base: handle --fork-point without reflog",
> 2016-10-12) you'd get:
>
> $ git rebase
> Current branch master is up to date.
I'm not entirely sure this is a regression, and not the patch bringing
the behavior into line with what would happen when you _do_ have a
reflog.
> The results are not the same for "git rebase @{u}" or "git rebase $(git
> rev-parse @{u})":
Those aren't using "--fork-point", so they're going to behave
differently. The default with no arguments is basically "--fork-point
@{u}".
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-21 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-14 13:23 BUG: 2.11-era rebase regression when @{upstream} is implicitly used Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-02-21 14:10 ` Jeff King [this message]
2019-02-21 14:50 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-02-21 15:10 ` Jeff King
2019-02-21 21:40 ` [PATCH 0/2] rebase: fix 2.11.0-era --fork-point regression Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-02-21 21:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] rebase tests: test linear branch topology Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-02-22 14:53 ` Jeff King
2019-02-22 18:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-02-21 21:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] rebase: don't rebase linear topology with --fork-point Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-02-22 15:08 ` Jeff King
2019-02-22 16:49 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2019-02-24 10:10 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190221141042.GA21737@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).