From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: insteadOf and git-request-pull output
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 12:31:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181122173109.GI28192@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq7ehbhk63.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 11:07:32PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
> > I suspect it would be less confusing if the rewrite were inverted, like:
> >
> > [url "gh:"]
> > rewriteTo = https://github.com
> > rewritePrivate
> >
> > [url "git://github.com"]
> > rewriteTo = https://github.com
> >
> > where the mapping of sections to rewrite rules must be one-to-one, not
> > one-to-many (and you can see that the flip side is that we have to
> > repeat ourselves).
> >
> > I hate to introduce two ways of doing the same thing, but maybe it is
> > simple enough to explain that url.X.insteadOf=Y is identical to
> > url.Y.rewriteTo=X. I do think people have gotten confused by the
> > ordering of insteadOf over the years, so this would let them specify it
> > in whichever way makes the most sense to them.
>
> I do admit that the current "insteadOf" was too cute a way to
> configure this feature and I often have to read it aloud twice
> before convincing myself I got X and Y right. It would have been
> cleaner if the definition were in the opposite direction, exactly
> because you can rewrite a single thing into just one way, but we do
> want to support that many things mapping to the same, and the
> approach to use "url.Y.rewriteTo=X" does express it better.
In case anybody is interested in picking this up, the code is actually
quite simple (the underlying data structure remains the same; we're just
inverting the order in the config). It would need documentation and
tests, and probably a matching pushRewriteTo.
diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index 28c7260ed1..26b1a7b119 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -345,6 +345,11 @@ static int handle_config(const char *key, const char *value, void *cb)
return config_error_nonbool(key);
rewrite = make_rewrite(&rewrites_push, name, namelen);
add_instead_of(rewrite, xstrdup(value));
+ } else if (!strcmp(subkey, "rewriteto")) {
+ if (!value)
+ return config_error_nonbool(key);
+ rewrite = make_rewrite(&rewrites, value, strlen(value));
+ add_instead_of(rewrite, xmemdupz(name, namelen));
}
}
However, I did notice the cleanup below as part of writing that. It may
be worth applying independently.
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] remote: check config validity before creating rewrite struct
When parsing url.foo.insteadOf, we call make_rewrite() and only then
check to make sure the config value is a string (and return an error if
it isn't). This isn't quite a leak, because the struct we allocate is
part of a global array, but it does leave a funny half-finished struct.
In practice, it doesn't make much difference because we exit soon after
due to the config error anyway. But let's flip the order here to avoid
leaving a trap for somebody in the future.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
---
remote.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index b850f2feb3..28c7260ed1 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -336,14 +336,14 @@ static int handle_config(const char *key, const char *value, void *cb)
if (!name)
return 0;
if (!strcmp(subkey, "insteadof")) {
- rewrite = make_rewrite(&rewrites, name, namelen);
if (!value)
return config_error_nonbool(key);
+ rewrite = make_rewrite(&rewrites, name, namelen);
add_instead_of(rewrite, xstrdup(value));
} else if (!strcmp(subkey, "pushinsteadof")) {
- rewrite = make_rewrite(&rewrites_push, name, namelen);
if (!value)
return config_error_nonbool(key);
+ rewrite = make_rewrite(&rewrites_push, name, namelen);
add_instead_of(rewrite, xstrdup(value));
}
}
--
2.20.0.rc1.703.g93fba25b62
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-22 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-15 18:28 insteadOf and git-request-pull output Konstantin Ryabitsev
2018-11-15 18:54 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-11-15 19:26 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2018-11-16 4:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-11-16 11:56 ` brian m. carlson
2018-11-17 7:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-11-17 12:27 ` Jeff King
2018-11-17 14:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-11-22 17:31 ` Jeff King [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181122173109.GI28192@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).