git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Tim Schumacher <timschumi@gmx.de>, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alias: detect loops in mixed execution mode
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 04:39:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181026083905.GA1705@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181020185852.GA6234@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 02:58:53PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 01:14:28PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> 
> > > I'd guess this sort of thing is pretty rare. But I wonder if we're
> > > crossing the line of trying to assume too much about what the user's
> > > arbitrary code does.
> > >
> > > A simple depth counter can limit the fork bomb, and with a high enough
> > > depth would be unlikely to trigger a false positive. It could also
> > > protect non-aliases more reasonably, too (e.g., if you have a 1000-deep
> > > git process hierarchy, there's a good chance you've found an infinite
> > > loop in git itself).
> > 
> > I don't think this edge case you're describing is very plausible, and I
> > doubt it exists in the wild.
> > 
> > But going by my personal incredulity and a git release breaking code in
> > the wild would suck, so agree that I need to re-roll this to anticipate
> > that.
> 
> I agree it's probably quite rare, if it exists at all. But I also wonder
> how important looping alias protection is. It's also rare, and the
> outcome is usually "gee, I wonder why this is taking so long? ^C".

Hmph. So I was speaking before purely hypothetically, but now that your
patch is in 'next', it is part of my daily build. And indeed, I hit a
false positive within 5 minutes of building it. ;)

I have an alias like this:

  $ git help dotgit
  'dotgit' is aliased to '!git rev-parse 2>/dev/null || cd ~/compile/git; git'

The idea being that I can run "git dotgit foo" to run "git foo" in the
current directory, or if it is not a git repository, in my checkout of
git.git.

I use it in two ways:

  - some of my aliases know about it themselves. So I have an alias "ll"
    that does:

      $ git help ll
      'll' is aliased to '!git dotgit --no-pager log --no-walk=unsorted --format='%h (%s, %ad)' --date=short'

    with the idea being to produce a nice annotation for a commit id.
    Using "git dotgit" there lets me just run it from any directory,
    since 99% of the time I am working on git.git anyway.

  - I have a vim command defined:

      command! -nargs=* Git :call MaybeInlineCommand("git dotgit <args>")

    so I can do ":Git foo" inside vim and it uses either the current
    repo (e.g., if I'm writing a commit message) or git.git (e.g., if
    I'm writing an email and didn't start in the repo).

So of course the alias expansion is something like (in older versions of
Git):

  1. "git dotgit ll" runs the dotgit alias, which sees that we need to go
     to the git.git checkout

  2. that runs "git ll"

  3. that runs "git dotgit log"; this second dotgit invocation sees we're
     already in a repository and is a noop

  4. git-log runs

With your patch, step 3 complains:

  $ git dotgit ll
  fatal: alias loop detected: expansion of 'dotgit' does not terminate:
  dotgit <==
  ll ==>

So I would really prefer a depth counter that can be set sufficiently
high to make this case work. ;)


As an aside, I got to experience this error message as an unsuspecting
user would. Unfortunately the output was not super helpful for figuring
out the cause. I scratched my head for a while before remembering that
"ll" uses "dotgit" explicitly (which was quite apparent when running
GIT_TRACE=1, or "git help ll"). I think showing the alias definitions in
the loop output would have made it much more obvious (if perhaps a bit
uglier).  E.g., something like:

  fatal: alias loop...
  ==> dotgit is aliased to '!git rev-parse ...'
  <== ll is aliased to '!git dotgit ...'

-Peff

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-26  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-05  8:54 [RFC PATCH v2] Allow aliases that include other aliases Tim Schumacher
2018-09-05 15:48 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-09-05 19:02   ` Tim Schumacher
2018-09-05 17:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-05 19:12   ` Tim Schumacher
2018-09-05 17:34 ` Jeff King
2018-09-05 20:02   ` Tim Schumacher
2018-09-06 13:38     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-09-06 14:17     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-10-18 22:57       ` [PATCH] alias: detect loops in mixed execution mode Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-10-19  8:28         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-10-19 22:09           ` Jeff King
2018-10-20 10:52             ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-10-19 22:07         ` Jeff King
2018-10-20 11:14           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-10-20 18:58             ` Jeff King
2018-10-20 19:18               ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-10-22 21:15                 ` Jeff King
2018-10-22 21:28                   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-10-22  1:23               ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-26  8:39               ` Jeff King [this message]
2018-10-26 12:44                 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-10-29  3:44                 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-10-29 14:17                   ` Jeff King
2018-09-05 21:51   ` [RFC PATCH v2] Allow aliases that include other aliases Junio C Hamano
2018-09-06 10:16 ` [PATCH v3] " Tim Schumacher
2018-09-06 14:01   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-09-06 14:57     ` Jeff King
2018-09-06 15:10       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-09-06 16:18         ` Jeff King
2018-09-06 19:05       ` Tim Schumacher
2018-09-06 19:17         ` Jeff King
2018-09-06 14:59   ` Jeff King
2018-09-06 18:40     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-06 19:05       ` Jeff King
2018-09-06 19:31       ` Tim Schumacher
2018-09-07 22:44 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] Add support for nested aliases Tim Schumacher
2018-09-07 22:44   ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/3] Show the call history when an alias is looping Tim Schumacher
2018-09-08 13:34     ` Duy Nguyen
2018-09-08 16:29       ` Jeff King
2018-09-07 22:44   ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] t0014: Introduce alias testing suite Tim Schumacher
2018-09-07 23:38     ` Eric Sunshine
2018-09-14 23:12       ` Tim Schumacher
2018-09-16  7:21         ` Eric Sunshine
2018-09-08 13:28   ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] Add support for nested aliases Duy Nguyen
2018-09-16  7:46     ` Tim Schumacher
2018-09-17 15:37       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-21 12:45         ` Tim Schumacher
2018-09-21 15:59           ` Junio C Hamano
2018-09-16  7:50   ` [PATCH v5 " Tim Schumacher
2018-09-16  7:50     ` [PATCH v5 2/3] Show the call history when an alias is looping Tim Schumacher
2018-09-16  7:50     ` [PATCH v5 3/3] t0014: Introduce an alias testing suite Tim Schumacher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181026083905.GA1705@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=timschumi@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).