From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4791F453 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729452AbeI1WuE (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2018 18:50:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com ([209.85.128.66]:37593 "EHLO mail-wm1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726473AbeI1WuE (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2018 18:50:04 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id y26-v6so2818277wma.2 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:25:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BnazkoRB68yqh9CsAV0vCdukrEovXKyoN2RpedXiuHE=; b=NlrfbS+M4KLYTmETmXJjYYuYzTKNlcJVABqFSTpAlNmibLOPkn3u5EUdVKMQ+XaNQt fcLyDaGbSv1z8AY23kFTHEGOgyep86QWxAgtW3ElgLyuCk/6GqSkzerYwLhCCh9s709L TVfdCr++YARsKjWnAV3uupbFbkqbrgyJSytQlStkChNVYjGI5ChMk+b5JcXutYOv5k94 WPJCApTMnObP+TG7tMOSOg73q+uzO1jdh2J+va/uTpv+XvwcUeL61UbSJAsJwX7m/0RW QK2/xLxjjN+NQuy3QtlQmUgrDo5pgaI+uoSzRiLZnEp3RlxuU22BMOVtGks1B4dfGSJq G+Fg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BnazkoRB68yqh9CsAV0vCdukrEovXKyoN2RpedXiuHE=; b=LHNr5YmQ+MfRmKTzF1Q4WJ3jRp62zFXdT0xGigPRxkrR0AdSpR01w/M8FMTOKXWRka EhVzCHJTxHHcXED8AeZUUkle34Fs9SEYbq7hK1U/Xa4A2hSdRueSXQjoaNjqrl01Acba FMi36kUCgcHbNvIOyyFjqD9GE83TbOAuBtgpwMM9d7ECE+5MxFNH1rOsanO43wG+NhBR 9C5SpxEWLfILBRxMXo44ViYJK1VVRz4Mi6zddCaK5AuBHia1ZBCILdnjQd4sXXomxC9a mB3s0Zl+79DPe4JhsB02WKR92r0htMk6CEKVF/hsO7LG2hwMLDyn4xpJL4KqtzTJOo+Y pueQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogO8QbLYqM53zRDyTgqUuR290ilnAhXuHwodjOz3eKP2KzPpcWP OOcn09ioTv1GKJ/KQU7Tl7wbaPm+ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60gzvnICsVAcM5LpDzfTCXfq5cLlcwTWbYG9S1FnToY6jgVi4vl4SCbPaUmyB15qEQ1HtUTxw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f10a:: with SMTP id p10-v6mr88340wmh.127.1538151929551; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (x4db1ef73.dyn.telefonica.de. [77.177.239.115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s24-v6sm1628247wmc.7.2018.09.28.09.25.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:25:28 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?q?SZEDER=20G=C3=A1bor?= To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Duy Nguyen , Thomas Gummerer , =?UTF-8?q?=C3=86var=20Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0=20Bjarmason?= , Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu , git@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?q?SZEDER=20G=C3=A1bor?= Subject: [PATCH v3 6/6] split-index: smudge and add racily clean cache entries to split index Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 18:24:59 +0200 Message-Id: <20180928162459.17138-7-szeder.dev@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.0.361.gafc87ffe72 In-Reply-To: <20180928162459.17138-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com> References: <20180927124434.30835-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com> <20180928162459.17138-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Ever since the split index feature was introduced [1], refreshing a split index is prone to a variant of the classic racy git problem. Consider the following sequence of commands updating the split index when the shared index contains a racily clean cache entry, i.e. an entry whose cached stat data matches with the corresponding file in the worktree and the cached mtime matches that of the index: echo "cached content" >file git update-index --split-index --add file echo "dirty worktree" >file # size stays the same! # ... wait ... git update-index --add other-file Normally, when a non-split index is updated, then do_write_index() (the function responsible for writing all kinds of indexes, "regular", split, and shared) recognizes racily clean cache entries, and writes them with smudged stat data, i.e. with file size set to 0. When subsequent git commands read the index, they will notice that the smudged stat data doesn't match with the file in the worktree, and then go on to check the file's content and notice its dirtiness. In the above example, however, in the second 'git update-index' prepare_to_write_split_index() decides which cache entries stored only in the shared index should be replaced in the new split index. Alas, this function never looks out for racily clean cache entries, and since the file's stat data in the worktree hasn't changed since the shared index was written, it won't be replaced in the new split index. Consequently, do_write_index() doesn't even get this racily clean cache entry, and can't smudge its stat data. Subsequent git commands will then see that the index has more recent mtime than the file and that the (not smudged) cached stat data still matches with the file in the worktree, and, ultimately, will erroneously consider the file clean. Modify prepare_to_write_split_index() to recognize racily clean cache entries, and mark them to be added to the split index. Note that there are two places where it should check raciness: first those cache entries that are only stored in the shared index, and then those that have been copied by unpack_trees() from the shared index while it constructed a new index. This way do_write_index() will get these racily clean cache entries as well, and will then write them with smudged stat data to the new split index. Note that after this change if the index is split when it contains a racily clean cache entry, then a smudged cache entry will be written both to the new shared and to the new split indexes. This doesn't affect regular git commands: as far as they are concerned this is just an entry in the split index replacing an outdated entry in the shared index. It did affect a few tests in 't1700-split-index.sh', though, because they actually check which entries are stored in the split index; a previous patch in this series has already made the necessary adjustments in 't1700'. And racily clean cache entries and index splitting are rare enough to not worry about the resulting duplicated smudged cache entries, and the additional complexity required to prevent them is not worth it. Several tests failed occasionally when the test suite was run with 'GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=yes'. Here are those that I managed to trace back to this racy split index problem, starting with those failing more frequently, with a link to a failing Travis CI build job for each. The highlighted line [2] shows when the racy file was written, which is not always in the failing test but in a preceeding setup test. t3903-stash.sh: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/385542084#L5858 t4024-diff-optimize-common.sh: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/386531969#L3174 t4015-diff-whitespace.sh: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/360797600#L8215 t2200-add-update.sh: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/382543426#L3051 t0090-cache-tree.sh: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/416583010#L3679 There might be others, e.g. perhaps 't1000-read-tree-m-3way.sh' and others using 'lib-read-tree-m-3way.sh', but I couldn't confirm yet. [1] In the branch leading to the merge commit v2.1.0-rc0~45 (Merge branch 'nd/split-index', 2014-07-16). [2] Note that those highlighted lines are in the 'after failure' fold, and your browser might unhelpfully fold it up before you could take a good look. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor --- cache.h | 2 ++ read-cache.c | 2 +- split-index.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- t/t1701-racy-split-index.sh | 8 ++----- 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h index 4d014541ab..3f419b6c79 100644 --- a/cache.h +++ b/cache.h @@ -781,6 +781,8 @@ extern void *read_blob_data_from_index(const struct index_state *, const char *, #define CE_MATCH_REFRESH 0x10 /* don't refresh_fsmonitor state or do stat comparison even if CE_FSMONITOR_VALID is true */ #define CE_MATCH_IGNORE_FSMONITOR 0X20 +extern int is_racy_timestamp(const struct index_state *istate, + const struct cache_entry *ce); extern int ie_match_stat(struct index_state *, const struct cache_entry *, struct stat *, unsigned int); extern int ie_modified(struct index_state *, const struct cache_entry *, struct stat *, unsigned int); diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c index 7b1354d759..8f644f68b4 100644 --- a/read-cache.c +++ b/read-cache.c @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static int is_racy_stat(const struct index_state *istate, ); } -static int is_racy_timestamp(const struct index_state *istate, +int is_racy_timestamp(const struct index_state *istate, const struct cache_entry *ce) { return (!S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode) && diff --git a/split-index.c b/split-index.c index 7d8799f6b7..d989b27286 100644 --- a/split-index.c +++ b/split-index.c @@ -235,8 +235,39 @@ void prepare_to_write_split_index(struct index_state *istate) } ce->ce_flags |= CE_MATCHED; /* or "shared" */ base = si->base->cache[ce->index - 1]; - if (ce == base) + if (ce == base) { + /* The entry is present in the shared index. */ + if (ce->ce_flags & CE_UPDATE_IN_BASE) { + /* + * Already marked for inclusion in + * the split index, either because + * the corresponding file was + * modified and the cached stat data + * was refreshed, or because there + * is already a replacement entry in + * the split index. + * Nothing more to do here. + */ + } else if (!ce_uptodate(ce) && + is_racy_timestamp(istate, ce)) { + /* + * A racily clean cache entry stored + * only in the shared index: it must + * be added to the split index, so + * the subsequent do_write_index() + * can smudge its stat data. + */ + ce->ce_flags |= CE_UPDATE_IN_BASE; + } else { + /* + * The entry is only present in the + * shared index and it was not + * refreshed. + * Just leave it there. + */ + } continue; + } if (ce->ce_namelen != base->ce_namelen || strcmp(ce->name, base->name)) { ce->index = 0; @@ -257,6 +288,15 @@ void prepare_to_write_split_index(struct index_state *istate) * the split index. * Nothing to do. */ + } else if (!ce_uptodate(ce) && + is_racy_timestamp(istate, ce)) { + /* + * A copy of a racily clean cache entry from + * the shared index. It must be added to + * the split index, so the subsequent + * do_write_index() can smudge its stat data. + */ + ce->ce_flags |= CE_UPDATE_IN_BASE; } else { /* * Thoroughly compare the cached data to see diff --git a/t/t1701-racy-split-index.sh b/t/t1701-racy-split-index.sh index fbb77046da..5dc221ef38 100755 --- a/t/t1701-racy-split-index.sh +++ b/t/t1701-racy-split-index.sh @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ done for trial in $trials do - test_expect_failure "update the split index when a racily clean cache entry is stored only in the shared index $trial" ' + test_expect_success "update the split index when a racily clean cache entry is stored only in the shared index #$trial" ' rm -f .git/index .git/sharedindex.* && # The next three commands must be run within the same @@ -170,8 +170,6 @@ do # entry of racy-file is only stored in the shared index. # A corresponding replacement cache entry with smudged # stat data should be added to the new split index. - # - # Alas, such a smudged replacement entry is not added! git update-index --add other-file && # Subsequent git commands should notice the smudged @@ -182,7 +180,7 @@ done for trial in $trials do - test_expect_failure "update the split index after unpack trees() copied a racily clean cache entry from the shared index $trial" ' + test_expect_success "update the split index after unpack trees() copied a racily clean cache entry from the shared index #$trial" ' rm -f .git/index .git/sharedindex.* && # The next three commands must be run within the same @@ -205,8 +203,6 @@ do # index. A corresponding replacement cache entry # with smudged stat data should be added to the new # split index. - # - # Alas, such a smudged replacement entry is not added! git read-tree -m HEAD && # Subsequent git commands should notice the smudged -- 2.19.0.361.gafc87ffe72